Seek Returns logo

ULTA vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ULTA and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ULTA is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolULTAVIPS
Company NameUlta Beauty, Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization23.80 billion USD8.51 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 25, 2007March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ULTA and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ULTA vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolULTAVIPS
5-Day Price Return2.44%2.62%
13-Week Price Return30.82%19.53%
26-Week Price Return43.59%17.18%
52-Week Price Return39.01%35.91%
Month-to-Date Return2.81%14.38%
Year-to-Date Return21.74%28.14%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.58M2.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.72M3.20M
3-Month Volatility30.80%27.56%
Beta1.060.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ULTA

49.73%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, ULTA’s Return on Equity of 49.73% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ULTA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ULTA

10.70%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.70% places ULTA in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ULTA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ULTA

14.03%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

ULTA’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.03% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ULTA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolULTAVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)49.73%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.15%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.70%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.03%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.55%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ULTA

1.67

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

ULTA’s Current Ratio of 1.67 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ULTA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ULTA

0.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, ULTA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ULTA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ULTA

649.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 649.00, ULTA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ULTA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolULTAVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.671.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.391.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)649.00150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

ULTA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ULTA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ULTA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ULTA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ULTA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ULTA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ULTA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ULTA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolULTAVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ULTA

19.42

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

ULTA’s P/E Ratio of 19.42 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ULTA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ULTA

2.61

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

ULTA’s P/S Ratio of 2.61 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ULTA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ULTA

7.32

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

ULTA’s P/B Ratio of 7.32 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ULTA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolULTAVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.427.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.610.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.321.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.19--