Seek Returns logo

UI vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at UI and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolUIZM
Company NameUbiquiti Inc.Zoom Communications Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentSoftware
Market Capitalization41.28 billion USD23.90 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 14, 2011April 18, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of UI and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

UI vs. ZM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolUIZM
5-Day Price Return0.67%-2.91%
13-Week Price Return69.31%3.19%
26-Week Price Return135.48%9.01%
52-Week Price Return204.85%17.15%
Month-to-Date Return3.30%-3.21%
Year-to-Date Return105.57%-2.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.18M2.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.15M3.14M
3-Month Volatility73.93%34.78%
Beta1.340.82

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

UI

179.90%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

UI’s Return on Equity of 179.90% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ZM

13.40%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

ZM’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UI vs. ZM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

UI

27.66%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

UI’s Net Profit Margin of 27.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ZM

24.99%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.99% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UI vs. ZM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

UI

32.50%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

UI’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ZM

20.43%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

ZM’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.43% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UI vs. ZM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolUIZM
Return on Equity (TTM)179.90%13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)55.77%10.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.66%24.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.50%20.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.42%76.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

UI

1.65

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

UI’s Current Ratio of 1.65 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZM

4.45

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.45 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

UI vs. ZM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

UI

0.37

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

UI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ZM

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UI vs. ZM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

UI

27.30

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

UI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 27.30 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ZM

7.63

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

ZM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UI vs. ZM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolUIZM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.654.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.624.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.370.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)27.307.63

Growth

Revenue Growth

UI vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

UI vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UI

0.35%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Yield of 0.35% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UI vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

UI

20.39%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.39% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UI vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolUIZM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.35%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.39%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

UI

58.05

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

UI’s P/E Ratio of 58.05 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZM

20.72

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/E Ratio of 20.72 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UI vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

UI

16.06

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 16.06, UI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ZM

5.18

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

ZM’s P/S Ratio of 5.18 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UI vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

UI

37.26

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

At 37.26, UI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZM

2.50

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

ZM’s P/B Ratio of 2.50 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UI vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolUIZM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)58.0520.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)16.065.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)37.262.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)65.8613.34