Seek Returns logo

UBER vs. ZS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at UBER and ZS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolUBERZS
Company NameUber Technologies, Inc.Zscaler, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGround TransportationSoftware
Market Capitalization205.31 billion USD48.21 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 10, 2019March 16, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of UBER and ZS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

UBER vs. ZS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolUBERZS
5-Day Price Return0.19%5.36%
13-Week Price Return5.01%-4.55%
26-Week Price Return32.07%41.65%
52-Week Price Return29.33%74.45%
Month-to-Date Return4.50%8.16%
Year-to-Date Return62.42%66.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume21.81M1.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume19.01M2.06M
3-Month Volatility28.08%28.49%
Beta1.471.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ZS

-2.50%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

ZS has a negative Return on Equity of -2.50%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

UBER vs. ZS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZS

-1.55%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

ZS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.55%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

UBER vs. ZS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ZS

-4.81%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

ZS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.81%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

UBER vs. ZS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolUBERZS
Return on Equity (TTM)62.42%-2.50%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.38%-0.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.68%-1.55%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.03%-4.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.93%76.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZS

2.01

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

ZS’s Current Ratio of 2.01 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER vs. ZS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ZS

0.95

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UBER vs. ZS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ZS

-6.38

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

ZS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.38. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UBER vs. ZS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolUBERZS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.112.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.971.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.420.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.24-6.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

UBER vs. ZS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

UBER vs. ZS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER vs. ZS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER vs. ZS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolUBERZS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

UBER

15.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZS

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for ZS is currently unavailable.

UBER vs. ZS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

UBER

4.27

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.27, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ZS

16.92

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

ZS’s P/S Ratio of 16.92 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER vs. ZS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZS

24.71

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

ZS’s P/B Ratio of 24.71 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER vs. ZS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolUBERZS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.99--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.2716.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.6324.71
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.6462.23