Seek Returns logo

UBER vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at UBER and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolUBERZM
Company NameUber Technologies, Inc.Zoom Communications Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGround TransportationSoftware
Market Capitalization198.80 billion USD24.23 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 10, 2019April 18, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of UBER and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

UBER vs. ZM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolUBERZM
5-Day Price Return1.17%10.65%
13-Week Price Return7.11%2.61%
26-Week Price Return20.84%-1.87%
52-Week Price Return31.29%13.52%
Month-to-Date Return8.64%9.33%
Year-to-Date Return58.04%-0.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume15.07M5.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume20.41M2.97M
3-Month Volatility29.53%33.68%
Beta1.490.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ZM

11.97%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

ZM’s Return on Equity of 11.97% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER vs. ZM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZM

22.31%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.31% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER vs. ZM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ZM

18.13%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

ZM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.13% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER vs. ZM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolUBERZM
Return on Equity (TTM)62.42%11.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.38%9.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.68%22.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.03%18.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.93%75.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZM

4.57

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.57 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

UBER vs. ZM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ZM

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER vs. ZM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ZM

7.63

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

ZM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER vs. ZM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolUBERZM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.114.57
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.974.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.420.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.247.63

Growth

Revenue Growth

UBER vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

UBER vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolUBERZM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZM

21.69

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/E Ratio of 21.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UBER vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ZM

4.84

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/S Ratio of 4.84 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

UBER vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZM

2.66

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

ZM’s P/B Ratio of 2.66 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UBER vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolUBERZM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.4921.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.134.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.632.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.9013.36