Seek Returns logo

UBER vs. XYZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at UBER and XYZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolUBERXYZ
Company NameUber Technologies, Inc.Block, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsFinancials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationFinancial Services
Market Capitalization208.75 billion USD47.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 10, 2019November 19, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of UBER and XYZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

UBER vs. XYZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolUBERXYZ
5-Day Price Return2.17%7.62%
13-Week Price Return3.54%12.06%
26-Week Price Return37.14%40.37%
52-Week Price Return37.24%18.49%
Month-to-Date Return2.17%7.62%
Year-to-Date Return65.95%-8.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume14.83M6.70M
3-Month Avg. Volume19.01M9.23M
3-Month Volatility28.55%40.42%
Beta1.192.67

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

XYZ

13.95%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

XYZ’s Return on Equity of 13.95% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

XYZ

12.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

XYZ’s Net Profit Margin of 12.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

XYZ

4.82%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

XYZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.82% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

UBER vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolUBERXYZ
Return on Equity (TTM)62.42%13.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.38%8.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.68%12.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.03%4.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.93%39.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XYZ

1.96

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

UBER vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

XYZ

0.26

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

UBER vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

XYZ

12.18

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

UBER vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolUBERXYZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.111.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.971.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.420.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.2412.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

UBER vs. XYZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

UBER vs. XYZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

XYZ

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XYZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

XYZ

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XYZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolUBERXYZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

UBER

16.67

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 16.67 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XYZ

16.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

XYZ’s P/E Ratio of 16.17 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

UBER

4.45

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.45, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

XYZ

2.01

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

UBER vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

XYZ

1.89

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

XYZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolUBERXYZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.6716.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.452.01
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.631.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.6544.60