Seek Returns logo

UBER vs. WDC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at UBER and WDC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolUBERWDC
Company NameUber Technologies, Inc.Western Digital Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGround TransportationTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization201.45 billion USD45.55 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 10, 2019October 31, 1978
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of UBER and WDC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

UBER vs. WDC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolUBERWDC
5-Day Price Return-2.98%12.48%
13-Week Price Return3.17%98.71%
26-Week Price Return32.58%224.78%
52-Week Price Return32.56%161.24%
Month-to-Date Return-1.40%9.37%
Year-to-Date Return60.15%191.43%
10-Day Avg. Volume15.54M10.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume18.92M7.61M
3-Month Volatility27.87%41.99%
Beta1.201.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

WDC

21.49%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
27.52%
Median
9.18%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-1.04%

WDC’s Return on Equity of 21.49% is on par with the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER vs. WDC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WDC

14.23%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
16.15%
Q3
7.95%
Median
4.80%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.23% places WDC in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER vs. WDC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WDC

22.10%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.74%
Median
6.27%
Q1
4.07%
Min
1.97%

WDC’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.10% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UBER vs. WDC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolUBERWDC
Return on Equity (TTM)62.42%21.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.38%9.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.68%14.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.03%22.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.93%38.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WDC

1.08

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.04
Median
1.41
Q1
0.98
Min
0.11

WDC’s Current Ratio of 1.08 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER vs. WDC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

WDC

0.85

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.85
Median
0.32
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

WDC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.85. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UBER vs. WDC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

WDC

2.04

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
76.01
Median
19.47
Q1
5.91
Min
-23.93

In the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, WDC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

UBER vs. WDC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolUBERWDC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.111.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.970.84
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.420.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.242.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

UBER vs. WDC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

UBER vs. WDC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WDC

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.33%
Q3
3.29%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WDC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER vs. WDC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WDC

15.60%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
77.17%
Median
40.90%
Q1
3.87%
Min
0.00%

WDC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.60% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER vs. WDC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolUBERWDC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%15.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

UBER

15.98

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.98 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WDC

24.56

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.10
Q3
28.67
Median
19.23
Q1
15.53
Min
9.46

WDC’s P/E Ratio of 24.56 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER vs. WDC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

UBER

4.26

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.26, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

WDC

3.49

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
5.63
Q3
3.18
Median
1.10
Q1
0.49
Min
0.04

WDC’s P/S Ratio of 3.49 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER vs. WDC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WDC

3.99

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
6.87
Median
1.88
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

WDC’s P/B Ratio of 3.99 is within the conventional range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER vs. WDC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolUBERWDC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.9824.56
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.263.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.633.99
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.6332.85