Seek Returns logo

UBER vs. VRSN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at UBER and VRSN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolUBERVRSN
Company NameUber Technologies, Inc.VeriSign, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGround TransportationIT Services
Market Capitalization195.47 billion USD25.18 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 10, 2019January 30, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of UBER and VRSN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

UBER vs. VRSN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolUBERVRSN
5-Day Price Return2.55%0.71%
13-Week Price Return1.37%-4.10%
26-Week Price Return16.74%16.60%
52-Week Price Return26.35%49.40%
Month-to-Date Return6.81%0.25%
Year-to-Date Return55.39%30.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume18.40M0.85M
3-Month Avg. Volume20.55M0.89M
3-Month Volatility29.59%29.55%
Beta1.490.78

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRSN

113.55%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

VRSN’s Return on Equity of 113.55% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UBER vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRSN

50.03%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

VRSN’s Net Profit Margin of 50.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UBER vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRSN

67.89%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

VRSN’s Operating Profit Margin of 67.89% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UBER vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolUBERVRSN
Return on Equity (TTM)62.42%113.55%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.38%55.87%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.68%50.03%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.03%67.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.93%87.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRSN

0.54

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

VRSN’s Current Ratio of 0.54 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UBER vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VRSN

1.07

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

VRSN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VRSN

27.96

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

VRSN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 27.96 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolUBERVRSN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.110.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.970.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.421.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.2427.96

Growth

Revenue Growth

UBER vs. VRSN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

UBER vs. VRSN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VRSN

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRSN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VRSN

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRSN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolUBERVRSN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRSN

31.73

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

A P/E Ratio of 31.73 places VRSN in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UBER vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VRSN

15.88

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 15.88, VRSN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UBER vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRSN

11.17

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

VRSN’s P/B Ratio of 11.17 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER vs. VRSN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolUBERVRSN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.4931.73
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.1315.88
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.6311.17
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.9026.71