Seek Returns logo

UBER vs. UNH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at UBER and UNH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolUBERUNH
Company NameUber Technologies, Inc.UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsHealth Care
GICS IndustryGround TransportationHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization195.47 billion USD271.56 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 10, 2019October 17, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of UBER and UNH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

UBER vs. UNH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolUBERUNH
5-Day Price Return2.55%10.44%
13-Week Price Return1.37%-5.08%
26-Week Price Return16.74%-43.55%
52-Week Price Return26.35%-48.19%
Month-to-Date Return6.81%20.15%
Year-to-Date Return55.39%-40.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume18.40M23.69M
3-Month Avg. Volume20.55M18.68M
3-Month Volatility29.59%48.27%
Beta1.490.44

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UNH

22.26%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UNH’s Return on Equity of 22.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER vs. UNH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UNH

5.04%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

UNH’s Net Profit Margin of 5.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER vs. UNH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UNH

7.26%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

UNH’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.26% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER vs. UNH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolUBERUNH
Return on Equity (TTM)62.42%22.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.38%7.01%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.68%5.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.03%7.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.93%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UNH

0.81

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

UNH’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UBER vs. UNH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UNH

0.79

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

UNH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER vs. UNH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UNH

6.14

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

UNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER vs. UNH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolUBERUNH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.110.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.970.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.420.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.246.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

UBER vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

UBER vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UNH

2.88%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.88%, UNH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UBER vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UNH

36.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.54% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolUBERUNH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%36.54%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UNH

12.70

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

UNH’s P/E Ratio of 12.70 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UNH

0.64

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

UNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.64 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UNH

2.82

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

UNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.82 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolUBERUNH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.4912.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.130.64
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.632.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.9010.70