Seek Returns logo

UAL vs. WM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at UAL and WM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolUALWM
Company NameUnited Airlines Holdings, Inc.Waste Management, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryPassenger AirlinesCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization32.32 billion USD91.45 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateFebruary 6, 2006June 22, 1988
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of UAL and WM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

UAL vs. WM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolUALWM
5-Day Price Return0.71%1.26%
13-Week Price Return26.99%-3.03%
26-Week Price Return-1.04%-0.58%
52-Week Price Return135.75%8.42%
Month-to-Date Return13.06%-0.93%
Year-to-Date Return2.82%12.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.22M2.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.44M1.71M
3-Month Volatility51.60%16.48%
Beta1.510.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

UAL

26.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

UAL’s Return on Equity of 26.43% is on par with the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WM

31.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, WM’s Return on Equity of 31.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UAL vs. WM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

UAL

5.71%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

UAL’s Net Profit Margin of 5.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WM

11.36%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.36% places WM in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UAL vs. WM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

UAL

8.62%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

UAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.62% is around the midpoint for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WM

17.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.52% places WM in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UAL vs. WM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolUALWM
Return on Equity (TTM)26.43%31.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.41%6.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.71%11.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.62%17.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.15%39.72%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

UAL

0.70

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

UAL’s Current Ratio of 0.70 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WM

0.86

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

WM’s Current Ratio of 0.86 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UAL vs. WM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

UAL

2.02

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

UAL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02 is typical for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WM

2.61

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.61, WM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UAL vs. WM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

UAL

5.76

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

UAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WM

6.82

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

WM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UAL vs. WM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolUALWM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.700.86
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.620.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.022.61
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.766.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

UAL vs. WM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

UAL vs. WM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WM

1.37%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

WM’s Dividend Yield of 1.37% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UAL vs. WM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

UAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WM

46.71%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

WM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.71% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UAL vs. WM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolUALWM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.37%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%46.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

UAL

9.78

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

UAL’s P/E Ratio of 9.78 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WM

34.02

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

WM’s P/E Ratio of 34.02 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UAL vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

UAL

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

UAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WM

3.86

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

WM’s P/S Ratio of 3.86 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UAL vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

UAL

1.94

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

UAL’s P/B Ratio of 1.94 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WM

10.01

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 10.01, WM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UAL vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolUALWM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.7834.02
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.563.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.9410.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.0042.79