Seek Returns logo

TXN vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TXN and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTXNUBER
Company NameTexas Instruments IncorporatedUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization182.53 billion USD195.47 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TXN and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TXN vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTXNUBER
5-Day Price Return3.64%2.55%
13-Week Price Return6.60%1.37%
26-Week Price Return11.05%16.74%
52-Week Price Return0.05%26.35%
Month-to-Date Return10.89%6.81%
Year-to-Date Return7.07%55.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.01M18.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.26M20.55M
3-Month Volatility36.45%29.59%
Beta1.031.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TXN

30.10%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, TXN’s Return on Equity of 30.10% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TXN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TXN

30.23%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.23% places TXN in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TXN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TXN

34.89%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 34.89% places TXN in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TXN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTXNUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)30.10%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.45%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)30.23%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)34.89%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.03%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TXN

5.81

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

TXN’s Current Ratio of 5.81 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TXN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TXN

0.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

TXN’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.86. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TXN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TXN

11.73

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

TXN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TXN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTXNUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)5.811.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.930.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.860.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.73-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

TXN vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TXN vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TXN

2.73%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.73%, TXN offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TXN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TXN

97.20%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TXN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 97.20% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TXN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTXNUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.73%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)97.20%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TXN

35.59

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

TXN’s P/E Ratio of 35.59 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TXN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TXN

10.76

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

TXN’s P/S Ratio of 10.76 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TXN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TXN

11.50

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

TXN’s P/B Ratio of 11.50 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TXN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTXNUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.5915.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.764.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)11.508.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)100.9622.90