Seek Returns logo

TTWO vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TTWO and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTTWOZM
Company NameTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc.Zoom Communications Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryEntertainmentSoftware
Market Capitalization47.53 billion USD24.23 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 15, 1997April 18, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TTWO and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TTWO vs. ZM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTTWOZM
5-Day Price Return-0.88%-3.16%
13-Week Price Return7.32%3.03%
26-Week Price Return24.33%9.75%
52-Week Price Return70.23%19.75%
Month-to-Date Return-0.26%-1.87%
Year-to-Date Return39.98%-0.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.93M2.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.85M3.16M
3-Month Volatility24.28%34.83%
Beta0.960.82

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ZM

13.40%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

ZM’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TTWO vs. ZM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ZM

24.99%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.99% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TTWO vs. ZM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ZM

20.43%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

ZM’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.43% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TTWO vs. ZM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTTWOZM
Return on Equity (TTM)-98.81%13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)-37.91%10.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-72.92%24.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-72.16%20.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.66%76.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZM

4.45

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.45 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TTWO vs. ZM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ZM

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TTWO vs. ZM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ZM

7.63

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

ZM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TTWO vs. ZM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTTWOZM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.164.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.014.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.880.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-44.747.63

Growth

Revenue Growth

TTWO vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TTWO vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTWO vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTWO vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTTWOZM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

ZM

20.72

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/E Ratio of 20.72 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TTWO vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

8.15

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 8.15 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ZM

5.18

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

ZM’s P/S Ratio of 5.18 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TTWO vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ZM

2.50

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

ZM’s P/B Ratio of 2.50 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TTWO vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTTWOZM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--20.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.155.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.742.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)210.2613.34