TTWO vs. XYZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at TTWO and XYZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	TTWO	XYZ
Company Name	Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.	Block, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Communication Services	Financials
GICS Industry	Entertainment	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	42.77 billion USD	48.21 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	April 15, 1997	November 19, 2015
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TTWO and XYZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TTWO vs. XYZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	TTWO	XYZ
5-Day Price Return	1.52%	6.43%
13-Week Price Return	2.58%	35.53%
26-Week Price Return	7.74%	-5.73%
52-Week Price Return	46.08%	23.87%
Month-to-Date Return	4.09%	2.36%
Year-to-Date Return	25.94%	-6.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.50M	7.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.15M	10.99M
3-Month Volatility	21.00%	41.26%
Beta	1.01	2.77

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 42.50%
Q3: 22.75%
Median: 12.88%
Q1: 7.15%
Min: -6.84%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

XYZ

13.95%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

XYZ’s Return on Equity of 13.95% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TTWO vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 45.25%
Q3: 23.93%
Median: 14.60%
Q1: 4.89%
Min: -22.94%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

XYZ

12.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

XYZ’s Net Profit Margin of 12.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TTWO vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 46.83%
Q3: 28.87%
Median: 15.26%
Q1: 8.95%
Min: -5.53%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

XYZ

4.82%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

XYZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.82% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TTWO vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	TTWO	XYZ
Return on Equity (TTM)	-98.81%	13.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-37.91%	8.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-72.92%	12.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-72.16%	4.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	56.66%	39.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max: 6.80
Q3: 3.77
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.39

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XYZ

1.96

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TTWO vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max: 1.65
Q3: 0.71
Median: 0.14
Q1: 0.04
Min: 0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

XYZ

0.26

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

TTWO vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max: 62.11
Q3: 31.19
Median: 7.50
Q1: 2.02
Min: -6.33

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

XYZ

12.18

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

TTWO vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	TTWO	XYZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.16	1.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.01	1.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.88	0.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-44.74	12.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

TTWO vs. XYZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TTWO vs. XYZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 2.54%
Q3: 1.29%
Median: 0.61%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

XYZ

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

XYZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTWO vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 82.30%
Q3: 45.76%
Median: 29.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

XYZ

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

XYZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTWO vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	TTWO	XYZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

Entertainment Industry

Max: 53.51
Q3: 45.31
Median: 33.16
Q1: 18.21
Min: 3.89

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

XYZ

16.06

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

XYZ’s P/E Ratio of 16.06 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TTWO vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

7.26

Entertainment Industry

Max: 12.81
Q3: 7.20
Median: 4.68
Q1: 3.32
Min: 0.79

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 7.26 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

XYZ

1.99

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

TTWO vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max: 17.11
Q3: 8.38
Median: 5.24
Q1: 2.18
Min: 0.67

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

XYZ

1.89

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

XYZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TTWO vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	TTWO	XYZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	16.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	7.26	1.99
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	12.74	1.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	187.28	44.30