Seek Returns logo

TTWO vs. V: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TTWO and V, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTTWOV
Company NameTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc.Visa Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesFinancials
GICS IndustryEntertainmentFinancial Services
Market Capitalization42.80 billion USD680.01 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateApril 15, 1997March 19, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TTWO and V by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TTWO vs. V: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTTWOV
5-Day Price Return1.83%1.94%
13-Week Price Return2.55%-2.49%
26-Week Price Return9.63%0.52%
52-Week Price Return44.68%30.63%
Month-to-Date Return4.18%1.41%
Year-to-Date Return26.05%10.86%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.36M5.59M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.16M6.30M
3-Month Volatility21.01%20.98%
Beta1.010.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

V

52.65%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

V’s Return on Equity of 52.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TTWO vs. V: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

V

52.16%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 52.16% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TTWO vs. V: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

V

62.21%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 62.21% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TTWO vs. V: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTTWOV
Return on Equity (TTM)-98.81%52.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)-37.91%21.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-72.92%52.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-72.16%62.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.66%80.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

V

1.12

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TTWO vs. V: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

V

0.65

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

TTWO vs. V: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

V

24.71

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

TTWO vs. V: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTTWOV
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.161.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.011.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.880.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-44.7424.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

TTWO vs. V: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TTWO vs. V: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

V

0.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

V’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TTWO vs. V: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

V

22.33%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

V’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.33% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TTWO vs. V: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTTWOV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%22.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

V

32.82

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

A P/E Ratio of 32.82 places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TTWO vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

7.26

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 7.26 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

V

17.12

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

TTWO vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

V

17.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

At 17.81, V’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TTWO vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTTWOV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--32.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.2617.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.7417.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)187.2830.15