Seek Returns logo

TTWO vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TTWO and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTTWOUBER
Company NameTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesIndustrials
GICS IndustryEntertainmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization42.18 billion USD195.47 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateApril 15, 1997May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TTWO and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TTWO vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTTWOUBER
5-Day Price Return-1.93%2.55%
13-Week Price Return-2.55%1.37%
26-Week Price Return8.84%16.74%
52-Week Price Return51.94%26.35%
Month-to-Date Return2.67%6.81%
Year-to-Date Return24.22%55.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.28M18.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.17M20.55M
3-Month Volatility23.84%29.59%
Beta1.011.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TTWO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TTWO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TTWO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTTWOUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)-98.81%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)-37.91%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-72.92%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-72.16%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.66%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TTWO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TTWO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TTWO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTTWOUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.161.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.010.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.880.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-44.74-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

TTWO vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TTWO vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTWO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTWO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTTWOUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TTWO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TTWO

7.26

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 7.26 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TTWO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TTWO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTTWOUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--15.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.264.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.748.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)187.2822.90