TT vs. XYL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at TT and XYL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	TT	XYL
Company Name	Trane Technologies plc	Xylem Inc.
Country	Ireland	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Building Products	Machinery
Market Capitalization	94.86 billion USD	34.53 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	October 13, 2011
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TT and XYL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TT vs. XYL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	TT	XYL
5-Day Price Return	-0.52%	0.02%
13-Week Price Return	-1.05%	10.84%
26-Week Price Return	18.00%	8.22%
52-Week Price Return	22.86%	5.57%
Month-to-Date Return	-2.69%	-1.90%
Year-to-Date Return	15.42%	22.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.92M	1.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.33M	1.35M
3-Month Volatility	23.98%	24.81%
Beta	1.15	1.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TT

37.61%

Building Products Industry

Max: 48.58%
Q3: 27.65%
Median: 16.01%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

XYL

8.70%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

XYL’s Return on Equity of 8.70% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TT vs. XYL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TT

13.76%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.11%
Q3: 15.09%
Median: 9.48%
Q1: 5.16%
Min: -3.43%

TT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.76% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Building Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

XYL

10.74%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

XYL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TT vs. XYL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TT

18.39%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.67%
Q3: 18.75%
Median: 14.89%
Q1: 8.70%
Min: -1.00%

TT’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.39% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

XYL

11.81%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

XYL’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.81% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TT vs. XYL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	TT	XYL
Return on Equity (TTM)	37.61%	8.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)	13.90%	5.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	13.76%	10.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	18.39%	11.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	36.26%	37.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TT

1.10

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.88

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

XYL

1.90

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

XYL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TT vs. XYL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TT

0.59

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XYL

0.18

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, XYL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TT vs. XYL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TT

15.31

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 15.31
Q1: 6.06
Min: 0.85

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

XYL

55.35

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

XYL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.35 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TT vs. XYL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	TT	XYL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.10	1.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.76	1.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.59	0.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	15.31	55.35

Growth

Revenue Growth

TT vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TT vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TT

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.56%
Q3: 1.94%
Median: 1.04%
Q1: 0.66%
Min: 0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XYL

1.05%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Yield of 1.05% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TT vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TT

27.94%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 77.74%
Median: 29.49%
Q1: 16.25%
Min: 0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XYL

39.55%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.55% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TT vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	TT	XYL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.84%	1.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	27.94%	39.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TT

33.13

Building Products Industry

Max: 66.79
Q3: 37.37
Median: 21.86
Q1: 17.57
Min: 9.70

TT’s P/E Ratio of 33.13 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XYL

37.52

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

A P/E Ratio of 37.52 places XYL in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TT vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TT

4.56

Building Products Industry

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.25
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.34

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

XYL

4.03

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

XYL’s P/S Ratio of 4.03 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TT vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TT

12.45

Building Products Industry

Max: 13.31
Q3: 6.85
Median: 3.20
Q1: 1.71
Min: 0.73

TT’s P/B Ratio of 12.45 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

XYL

2.84

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

XYL’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TT vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	TT	XYL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	33.13	37.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.56	4.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	12.45	2.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	33.66	40.41