Seek Returns logo

TT vs. WMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TT and WMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTTWMS
Company NameTrane Technologies plcAdvanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsBuilding Products
Market Capitalization94.66 billion USD10.94 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980July 25, 2014
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TT and WMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TT vs. WMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTTWMS
5-Day Price Return4.42%0.33%
13-Week Price Return-3.53%20.76%
26-Week Price Return19.85%23.64%
52-Week Price Return9.90%-13.47%
Month-to-Date Return1.53%-3.66%
Year-to-Date Return14.24%19.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.39M0.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.27M0.80M
3-Month Volatility25.48%49.43%
Beta1.171.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TT

37.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WMS

27.05%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

WMS’s Return on Equity of 27.05% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TT vs. WMS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TT

13.76%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.76% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WMS

14.82%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.82% places WMS in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TT vs. WMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TT

18.39%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.39% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WMS

21.82%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.82% places WMS in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TT vs. WMS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTTWMS
Return on Equity (TTM)37.61%27.05%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.90%11.74%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.76%14.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.39%21.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.26%37.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TT

1.10

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

WMS

3.22

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

WMS’s Current Ratio of 3.22 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Building Products industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TT vs. WMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TT

0.59

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WMS

0.81

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

WMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TT vs. WMS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TT

15.31

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WMS

9.67

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

WMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.67 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TT vs. WMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTTWMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.103.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.762.25
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.590.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.319.67

Growth

Revenue Growth

TT vs. WMS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TT vs. WMS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TT

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WMS

0.48%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

WMS’s Dividend Yield of 0.48% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TT vs. WMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TT

27.94%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WMS

11.85%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

WMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.85% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TT vs. WMS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTTWMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.84%0.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.94%11.85%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TT

33.14

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

A P/E Ratio of 33.14 places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

WMS

24.92

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

WMS’s P/E Ratio of 24.92 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TT vs. WMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TT

4.56

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WMS

3.69

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

WMS’s P/S Ratio of 3.69 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TT vs. WMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TT

12.45

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

At 12.45, TT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WMS

5.07

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

WMS’s P/B Ratio of 5.07 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TT vs. WMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTTWMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.1424.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.563.69
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.455.07
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.6722.92