Seek Returns logo

TT vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TT and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTTVRSK
Company NameTrane Technologies plcVerisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization94.87 billion USD34.02 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TT and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TT vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTTVRSK
5-Day Price Return0.67%-1.60%
13-Week Price Return-1.67%-19.83%
26-Week Price Return28.80%-20.19%
52-Week Price Return9.23%-8.45%
Month-to-Date Return1.05%-3.19%
Year-to-Date Return15.44%-11.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.19M1.18M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.25M1.07M
3-Month Volatility25.09%21.22%
Beta1.200.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TT

37.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TT vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TT

13.76%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.76% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.67% places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TT vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TT

18.39%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.39% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

TT vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTTVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)37.61%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.90%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.76%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.39%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.26%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TT

1.10

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TT vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TT

0.59

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TT vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TT

15.31

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TT vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTTVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.101.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.761.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.5910.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.3143.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

TT vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TT vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TT

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRSK

0.70%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.70% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TT vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TT

27.94%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TT vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTTVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.84%0.70%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.94%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TT

33.31

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

A P/E Ratio of 33.31 places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VRSK

37.00

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

A P/E Ratio of 37.00 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TT vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TT

4.59

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.59 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRSK

11.35

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 11.35, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TT vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TT

12.45

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

At 12.45, TT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TT vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTTVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.3137.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.5911.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.45139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.8433.22