Seek Returns logo

TT vs. ULS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TT and ULS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTTULS
Company NameTrane Technologies plcUL Solutions Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization94.86 billion USD13.44 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980April 12, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TT and ULS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TT vs. ULS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTTULS
5-Day Price Return-0.52%0.09%
13-Week Price Return-1.05%-8.09%
26-Week Price Return18.00%16.65%
52-Week Price Return22.86%24.93%
Month-to-Date Return-2.69%-8.51%
Year-to-Date Return15.42%34.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.92M1.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.33M0.90M
3-Month Volatility23.98%34.31%
Beta1.150.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TT

37.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ULS

34.07%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

In the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, ULS’s Return on Equity of 34.07% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TT

13.76%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

TT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.76% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Building Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ULS

11.08%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

ULS’s Net Profit Margin of 11.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TT

18.39%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

TT’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.39% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ULS

16.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

ULS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.71% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTTULS
Return on Equity (TTM)37.61%34.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.90%11.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.76%11.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.39%16.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.26%48.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TT

1.10

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ULS

1.32

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

ULS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TT

0.59

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ULS

0.56

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

ULS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TT

15.31

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ULS

11.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

ULS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTTULS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.101.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.761.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.590.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.3111.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

TT vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TT vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TT

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ULS

0.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TT

27.94%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ULS

31.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.19% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTTULS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.84%0.76%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.94%31.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TT

33.13

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

TT’s P/E Ratio of 33.13 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ULS

41.10

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 41.10 places ULS in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TT

4.56

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ULS

4.55

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

ULS’s P/S Ratio of 4.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TT

12.45

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

TT’s P/B Ratio of 12.45 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ULS

13.37

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

ULS’s P/B Ratio of 13.37 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTTULS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.1341.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.564.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.4513.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.6636.92