Seek Returns logo

TT vs. TXT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TT and TXT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTTTXT
Company NameTrane Technologies plcTextron Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization94.86 billion USD14.13 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TT and TXT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TT vs. TXT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTTTXT
5-Day Price Return-0.52%-1.28%
13-Week Price Return-1.05%3.76%
26-Week Price Return18.00%8.47%
52-Week Price Return22.86%-10.53%
Month-to-Date Return-2.69%1.95%
Year-to-Date Return15.42%3.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.92M1.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.33M1.55M
3-Month Volatility23.98%23.66%
Beta1.151.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TT

37.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TXT

11.31%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

TXT’s Return on Equity of 11.31% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TT vs. TXT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TT

13.76%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

TT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.76% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Building Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TXT

5.80%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

TXT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.80% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TT vs. TXT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TT

18.39%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

TT’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.39% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TXT

5.50%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

TXT’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.50% is in the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TT vs. TXT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTTTXT
Return on Equity (TTM)37.61%11.31%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.90%4.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.76%5.80%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.39%5.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.26%19.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TT

1.10

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TXT

1.70

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

TXT’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TT vs. TXT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TT

0.59

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TXT

0.50

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

TXT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TT vs. TXT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TT

15.31

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TXT

10.72

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

TXT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TT vs. TXT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTTTXT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.101.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.760.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.590.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.3110.72

Growth

Revenue Growth

TT vs. TXT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TT vs. TXT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TT

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TXT

0.08%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TXT’s Dividend Yield of 0.08% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TT vs. TXT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TT

27.94%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TXT

1.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TXT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 1.85% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TT vs. TXT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTTTXT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.84%0.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.94%1.85%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TT

33.13

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

TT’s P/E Ratio of 33.13 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TXT

17.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, TXT’s P/E Ratio of 17.34 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TT vs. TXT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TT

4.56

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TXT

1.01

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, TXT’s P/S Ratio of 1.01 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TT vs. TXT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TT

12.45

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

TT’s P/B Ratio of 12.45 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TXT

1.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

TXT’s P/B Ratio of 1.95 is in the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TT vs. TXT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTTTXT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.1317.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.561.01
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.451.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.6619.15