TSLA vs. WFC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 11, 2025

Here’s a clear look at TSLA and WFC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	TSLA	WFC
Company Name	Tesla, Inc.	Wells Fargo & Company
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Financials
GICS Industry	Automobiles	Banks
Market Capitalization	1,458.71 billion USD	255.41 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	June 29, 2010	June 1, 1972
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TSLA and WFC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TSLA vs. WFC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	TSLA	WFC
5-Day Price Return	0.62%	-0.96%
13-Week Price Return	48.27%	-2.52%
26-Week Price Return	64.13%	21.41%
52-Week Price Return	82.16%	39.49%
Month-to-Date Return	-1.36%	-4.88%
Year-to-Date Return	8.63%	13.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume	97.94M	11.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume	97.73M	15.87M
3-Month Volatility	45.56%	23.94%
Beta	1.86	1.13

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 28.52%
Q3: 12.70%
Median: 5.15%
Q1: -1.62%
Min: -18.19%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WFC

11.36%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.40%
Q3: 15.55%
Median: 12.00%
Q1: 8.98%
Min: -0.10%

WFC’s Return on Equity of 11.36% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TSLA vs. WFC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 8.82%
Q3: 5.80%
Median: 2.77%
Q1: -1.08%
Min: -10.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WFC

22.19%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.73%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.56%
Min: 6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, WFC’s Net Profit Margin of 22.19% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TSLA vs. WFC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 13.07%
Q3: 6.94%
Median: 4.50%
Q1: -2.17%
Min: -13.85%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WFC

25.35%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.73%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 12.28%

WFC’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.35% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TSLA vs. WFC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	TSLA	WFC
Return on Equity (TTM)	8.22%	11.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)	4.89%	1.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	6.54%	22.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	6.06%	25.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	17.48%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.13
Q3: 1.52
Median: 1.29
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.47

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

WFC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TSLA vs. WFC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.07
Q3: 1.17
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.05

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

WFC

2.01

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

TSLA vs. WFC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max: 77.87
Q3: 37.26
Median: 13.42
Q1: 1.43
Min: -49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

WFC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

TSLA vs. WFC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	TSLA	WFC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.04	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.35	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.09	2.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	71.48	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

TSLA vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TSLA vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.85%
Q3: 4.84%
Median: 2.53%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WFC

2.46%

Banks Industry

Max: 11.03%
Q3: 6.00%
Median: 3.87%
Q1: 2.41%
Min: 0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Yield of 2.46% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TSLA vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 131.16%
Q3: 60.59%
Median: 36.73%
Q1: 5.97%
Min: 0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WFC

31.00%

Banks Industry

Max: 134.24%
Q3: 79.39%
Median: 55.09%
Q1: 36.09%
Min: 0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.00% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TSLA vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	TSLA	WFC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	2.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	31.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

240.63

Automobiles Industry

Max: 31.95
Q3: 22.20
Median: 11.17
Q1: 7.39
Min: 4.54

At 240.63, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

WFC

12.60

Banks Industry

Max: 22.69
Q3: 13.75
Median: 10.32
Q1: 7.73
Min: 2.59

WFC’s P/E Ratio of 12.60 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TSLA vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

15.73

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.92
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 15.73, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

WFC

1.91

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

TSLA vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 1.83
Median: 0.79
Q1: 0.47
Min: 0.18

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WFC

1.42

Banks Industry

Max: 2.09
Q3: 1.40
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.29

WFC’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TSLA vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	TSLA	WFC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	240.63	12.60
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	15.73	1.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	13.23	1.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	261.14	17.11