Seek Returns logo

TSLA vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TSLA and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

TSLA is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolTSLAVIPS
Company NameTesla, Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization1,044.72 billion USD8.21 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 29, 2010March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TSLA and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TSLA vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTSLAVIPS
5-Day Price Return-3.48%-3.87%
13-Week Price Return-5.32%7.69%
26-Week Price Return-9.00%7.62%
52-Week Price Return45.43%18.83%
Month-to-Date Return5.07%10.40%
Year-to-Date Return-19.80%23.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume77.14M3.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume104.32M3.29M
3-Month Volatility55.64%30.95%
Beta2.030.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TSLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TSLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TSLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTSLAVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)8.22%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.89%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.54%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.06%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)17.48%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TSLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TSLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TSLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTSLAVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.041.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.351.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.090.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)71.48150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

TSLA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TSLA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TSLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TSLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTSLAVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

172.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 172.34, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TSLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

11.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 11.27, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TSLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TSLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTSLAVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)172.347.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.270.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.231.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)187.03--