Seek Returns logo

TSLA vs. UNH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TSLA and UNH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTSLAUNH
Company NameTesla, Inc.UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryHealth Care
GICS IndustryAutomobilesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization1,044.72 billion USD271.56 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 29, 2010October 17, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TSLA and UNH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TSLA vs. UNH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTSLAUNH
5-Day Price Return-3.48%10.44%
13-Week Price Return-5.32%-5.08%
26-Week Price Return-9.00%-43.55%
52-Week Price Return45.43%-48.19%
Month-to-Date Return5.07%20.15%
Year-to-Date Return-19.80%-40.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume77.14M23.69M
3-Month Avg. Volume104.32M18.68M
3-Month Volatility55.64%48.27%
Beta2.030.44

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UNH

22.26%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UNH’s Return on Equity of 22.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TSLA vs. UNH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UNH

5.04%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

UNH’s Net Profit Margin of 5.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TSLA vs. UNH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UNH

7.26%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

UNH’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.26% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TSLA vs. UNH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTSLAUNH
Return on Equity (TTM)8.22%22.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.89%7.01%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.54%5.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.06%7.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)17.48%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UNH

0.81

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

UNH’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TSLA vs. UNH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UNH

0.79

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

UNH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TSLA vs. UNH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UNH

6.14

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

UNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TSLA vs. UNH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTSLAUNH
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.040.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.350.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.090.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)71.486.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

TSLA vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TSLA vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UNH

2.88%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.88%, UNH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TSLA vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UNH

36.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.54% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TSLA vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTSLAUNH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%36.54%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

172.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 172.34, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UNH

12.70

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

UNH’s P/E Ratio of 12.70 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TSLA vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TSLA

11.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 11.27, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UNH

0.64

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

UNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.64 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TSLA vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UNH

2.82

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

UNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.82 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TSLA vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTSLAUNH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)172.3412.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.270.64
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.232.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)187.0310.70