Seek Returns logo

TS vs. WHD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TS and WHD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, WHD is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolTSWHD
Company NameTenaris S.A.Cactus, Inc.
CountryLuxembourgUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization18.96 billion USD2.90 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 16, 2002February 8, 2018
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TS and WHD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TS vs. WHD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTSWHD
5-Day Price Return1.82%6.01%
13-Week Price Return9.21%0.51%
26-Week Price Return-16.60%-31.13%
52-Week Price Return23.82%-28.29%
Month-to-Date Return1.33%-1.56%
Year-to-Date Return-13.42%-28.63%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.40M0.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.01M0.67M
3-Month Volatility26.07%40.68%
Beta0.741.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TS

11.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

TS’s Return on Equity of 11.86% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WHD

16.73%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

WHD’s Return on Equity of 16.73% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TS vs. WHD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TS

17.02%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

TS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

WHD

16.19%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.19% places WHD in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TS vs. WHD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TS

18.93%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.93% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WHD

24.72%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.72% places WHD in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TS vs. WHD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTSWHD
Return on Equity (TTM)11.86%16.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.70%10.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.02%16.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.93%24.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.79%37.97%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TS

3.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

TS’s Current Ratio of 3.41 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

WHD

4.85

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

WHD’s Current Ratio of 4.85 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TS vs. WHD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TS

0.03

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

WHD

0.02

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

At 0.02, WHD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio is unusually low for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This highlights a conservative capital structure, suggesting the company prioritizes financial stability over aggressive growth funded by debt.

TS vs. WHD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TS

101.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

WHD

41.49

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

WHD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 41.49 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TS vs. WHD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTSWHD
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.414.85
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.113.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.030.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)101.8041.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

TS vs. WHD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TS vs. WHD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TS

4.64%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.64%, TS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

WHD

1.13%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

WHD’s Dividend Yield of 1.13% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TS vs. WHD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TS

85.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WHD

19.71%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

WHD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.71% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TS vs. WHD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTSWHD
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.64%1.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)85.87%19.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TS

9.69

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s P/E Ratio of 9.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

WHD

17.46

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

WHD’s P/E Ratio of 17.46 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TS vs. WHD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TS

1.65

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WHD

2.83

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

With a P/S Ratio of 2.83, WHD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TS vs. WHD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TS

1.20

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WHD

3.04

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

WHD’s P/B Ratio of 3.04 is in the upper tier for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TS vs. WHD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTSWHD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.6917.46
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.652.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.203.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.4213.62