Seek Returns logo

TS vs. WFRD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TS and WFRD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, WFRD is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolTSWFRD
Company NameTenaris S.A.Weatherford International plc
CountryLuxembourgUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization18.77 billion USD4.57 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 16, 2002January 4, 2021
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TS and WFRD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TS vs. WFRD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTSWFRD
5-Day Price Return0.98%11.12%
13-Week Price Return6.42%39.53%
26-Week Price Return-17.12%-2.75%
52-Week Price Return20.59%-41.38%
Month-to-Date Return0.32%12.61%
Year-to-Date Return-14.28%-11.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.74M0.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.04M1.21M
3-Month Volatility25.71%47.56%
Beta0.741.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TS

11.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

TS’s Return on Equity of 11.86% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WFRD

35.03%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

In the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, WFRD’s Return on Equity of 35.03% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TS vs. WFRD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TS

17.02%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

TS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

WFRD

9.35%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

WFRD’s Net Profit Margin of 9.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TS vs. WFRD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TS

18.93%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.93% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WFRD

15.93%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

WFRD’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.93% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TS vs. WFRD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTSWFRD
Return on Equity (TTM)11.86%35.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.70%9.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.02%9.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.93%15.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.79%32.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TS

3.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

TS’s Current Ratio of 3.41 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

WFRD

2.21

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

WFRD’s Current Ratio of 2.21 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TS vs. WFRD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TS

0.03

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

WFRD

1.05

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

WFRD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.05. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TS vs. WFRD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TS

101.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

WFRD

7.60

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

WFRD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TS vs. WFRD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTSWFRD
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.412.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.111.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.031.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)101.807.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

TS vs. WFRD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TS vs. WFRD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TS

4.64%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.64%, TS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

WFRD

1.81%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

WFRD’s Dividend Yield of 1.81% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TS vs. WFRD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TS

85.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WFRD

14.97%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

WFRD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.97% is in the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TS vs. WFRD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTSWFRD
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.64%1.81%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)85.87%14.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TS

9.69

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s P/E Ratio of 9.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

WFRD

8.25

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, WFRD’s P/E Ratio of 8.25 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TS vs. WFRD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TS

1.65

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WFRD

0.77

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

WFRD’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TS vs. WFRD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TS

1.20

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WFRD

2.42

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

WFRD’s P/B Ratio of 2.42 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TS vs. WFRD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTSWFRD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.698.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.650.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.202.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.428.41