Seek Returns logo

TS vs. VLO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TS and VLO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, VLO is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolTSVLO
Company NameTenaris S.A.Valero Energy Corporation
CountryLuxembourgUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization18.98 billion USD50.46 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 16, 2002January 4, 1982
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TS and VLO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TS vs. VLO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTSVLO
5-Day Price Return2.67%-1.37%
13-Week Price Return-3.70%8.97%
26-Week Price Return-14.45%42.13%
52-Week Price Return4.81%12.82%
Month-to-Date Return2.67%-4.59%
Year-to-Date Return-13.70%32.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.07M2.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.08M2.99M
3-Month Volatility23.40%28.44%
Beta-0.120.77

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TS

11.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

TS’s Return on Equity of 11.86% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VLO

3.14%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

VLO’s Return on Equity of 3.14% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TS vs. VLO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TS

17.02%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.02% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VLO

0.62%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, VLO’s Net Profit Margin of 0.62% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TS vs. VLO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TS

18.93%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

TS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.93% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VLO

0.77%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

VLO’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.77% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TS vs. VLO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTSVLO
Return on Equity (TTM)11.86%3.14%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.70%1.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.02%0.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.93%0.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.79%2.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TS

3.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

TS’s Current Ratio of 3.41 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VLO

1.62

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

VLO’s Current Ratio of 1.62 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TS vs. VLO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TS

0.03

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VLO

0.44

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

VLO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.44 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TS vs. VLO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TS

101.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VLO

7.65

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

VLO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.65 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TS vs. VLO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTSVLO
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.411.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.111.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.030.44
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)101.807.65

Growth

Revenue Growth

TS vs. VLO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TS vs. VLO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TS

4.63%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.63%, TS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VLO

2.77%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

VLO’s Dividend Yield of 2.77% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TS vs. VLO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TS

85.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VLO

76.16%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

VLO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 76.16% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TS vs. VLO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTSVLO
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.63%2.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)85.87%76.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TS

9.71

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s P/E Ratio of 9.71 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VLO

65.69

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

At 65.69, VLO’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TS vs. VLO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TS

1.65

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VLO

0.41

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, VLO’s P/S Ratio of 0.41 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TS vs. VLO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TS

1.20

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VLO

1.75

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

VLO’s P/B Ratio of 1.75 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TS vs. VLO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTSVLO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.7165.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.650.41
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.201.75
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.4415.02
TS vs. VLO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison