Seek Returns logo

TS vs. VG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TS and VG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, VG is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolTSVG
Company NameTenaris S.A.--
CountryLuxembourgUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization18.66 billion USD30.50 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 16, 2002January 24, 2025
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TS and VG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TS vs. VG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTSVG
5-Day Price Return0.58%-8.39%
13-Week Price Return5.90%24.23%
26-Week Price Return-17.96%-17.85%
52-Week Price Return20.86%--
Month-to-Date Return0.58%-18.07%
Year-to-Date Return-14.06%-47.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.65M8.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.08M6.18M
3-Month Volatility27.06%81.24%
Beta0.730.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TS

11.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

TS’s Return on Equity of 11.86% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VG

30.99%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, VG’s Return on Equity of 30.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TS vs. VG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TS

17.02%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

TS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

VG

19.44%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.44% places VG in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TS vs. VG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TS

18.93%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.93% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VG

33.53%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.53% places VG in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TS vs. VG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTSVG
Return on Equity (TTM)11.86%30.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.70%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.02%19.44%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.93%33.53%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.79%62.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TS

3.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

TS’s Current Ratio of 3.41 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VG

1.39

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

VG’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TS vs. VG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TS

0.03

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VG

4.40

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.40, VG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TS vs. VG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TS

101.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VG

16.02

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

VG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.02 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TS vs. VG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTSVG
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.411.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.111.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.034.40
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)101.8016.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

TS vs. VG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TS vs. VG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TS

4.64%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.64%, TS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VG

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TS vs. VG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TS

85.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VG

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TS vs. VG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTSVG
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.64%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)85.87%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TS

9.69

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s P/E Ratio of 9.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VG

18.57

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, VG’s P/E Ratio of 18.57 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TS vs. VG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TS

1.65

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VG

3.61

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, VG’s P/S Ratio of 3.61 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TS vs. VG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TS

1.20

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VG

5.48

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

VG’s P/B Ratio of 5.48 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TS vs. VG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTSVG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.6918.57
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.653.61
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.205.48
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.42--