Seek Returns logo

TRU vs. ZTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TRU and ZTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

TRU is a standard domestic listing, while ZTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolTRUZTO
Company NameTransUnionZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization17.10 billion USD15.86 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 25, 2015October 27, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TRU and ZTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TRU vs. ZTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTRUZTO
5-Day Price Return-2.55%-1.28%
13-Week Price Return-4.47%13.58%
26-Week Price Return-12.46%1.98%
52-Week Price Return-6.25%2.50%
Month-to-Date Return-7.81%1.84%
Year-to-Date Return-5.34%2.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.95M3.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.13M2.52M
3-Month Volatility35.70%39.66%
Beta1.750.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TRU

9.04%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

TRU’s Return on Equity of 9.04% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ZTO

15.30%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.47%
Median
11.35%
Q1
7.21%
Min
2.53%

ZTO’s Return on Equity of 15.30% is on par with the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TRU vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TRU

8.99%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

TRU’s Net Profit Margin of 8.99% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ZTO

20.76%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
6.18%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.32%
Min
0.61%

ZTO’s Net Profit Margin of 20.76% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

TRU vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TRU

17.39%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

TRU’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.39% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ZTO

25.33%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
8.87%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.03%
Min
0.62%

ZTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.33% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

TRU vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTRUZTO
Return on Equity (TTM)9.04%15.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.55%10.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.99%20.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.39%25.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.24%29.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TRU

2.03

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

TRU’s Current Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ZTO

1.05

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.47
Median
1.29
Q1
1.05
Min
0.62

ZTO’s Current Ratio of 1.05 falls into the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TRU vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TRU

1.14

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

TRU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ZTO

0.27

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.06
Median
0.72
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TRU vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TRU

2.99

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.99 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ZTO

--

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.56
Q1
5.97
Min
-0.60

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ZTO is currently unavailable.

TRU vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTRUZTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.031.05
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.890.87
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.140.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.99--

Growth

Revenue Growth

TRU vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TRU vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TRU

0.50%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

TRU’s Dividend Yield of 0.50% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.43%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

ZTO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TRU vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TRU

22.05%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

TRU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.05% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
54.10%
Q1
0.19%
Min
0.00%

ZTO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TRU vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTRUZTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.50%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.05%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TRU

43.69

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 43.69 places TRU in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ZTO

12.01

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
34.55
Q3
23.34
Median
16.33
Q1
13.38
Min
6.36

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s P/E Ratio of 12.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TRU vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TRU

3.93

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

TRU’s P/S Ratio of 3.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ZTO

2.49

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.16
Median
0.59
Q1
0.36
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.49, ZTO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TRU vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TRU

3.80

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

TRU’s P/B Ratio of 3.80 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ZTO

1.82

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.81
Median
1.82
Q1
1.20
Min
0.74

ZTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.82 is within the conventional range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TRU vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTRUZTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)43.6912.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.932.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.801.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.409.58