Seek Returns logo

TRU vs. XYL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TRU and XYL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTRUXYL
Company NameTransUnionXylem Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesMachinery
Market Capitalization17.10 billion USD34.53 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 25, 2015October 13, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TRU and XYL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TRU vs. XYL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTRUXYL
5-Day Price Return-2.55%0.02%
13-Week Price Return-4.47%10.84%
26-Week Price Return-12.46%8.22%
52-Week Price Return-6.25%5.57%
Month-to-Date Return-7.81%-1.90%
Year-to-Date Return-5.34%22.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.95M1.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.13M1.35M
3-Month Volatility35.70%24.81%
Beta1.751.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TRU

9.04%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

TRU’s Return on Equity of 9.04% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

XYL

8.70%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

XYL’s Return on Equity of 8.70% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TRU vs. XYL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TRU

8.99%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

TRU’s Net Profit Margin of 8.99% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

XYL

10.74%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

XYL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TRU vs. XYL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TRU

17.39%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

TRU’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.39% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

XYL

11.81%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

XYL’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.81% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TRU vs. XYL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTRUXYL
Return on Equity (TTM)9.04%8.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.55%5.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.99%10.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.39%11.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.24%37.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TRU

2.03

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

TRU’s Current Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

XYL

1.90

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

XYL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRU vs. XYL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TRU

1.14

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

TRU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XYL

0.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, XYL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TRU vs. XYL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TRU

2.99

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.99 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

XYL

55.35

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

XYL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.35 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TRU vs. XYL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTRUXYL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.031.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.891.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.140.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.9955.35

Growth

Revenue Growth

TRU vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TRU vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TRU

0.50%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

TRU’s Dividend Yield of 0.50% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

XYL

1.05%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Yield of 1.05% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TRU vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TRU

22.05%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

TRU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.05% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XYL

39.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.55% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TRU vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTRUXYL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.50%1.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.05%39.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TRU

43.69

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 43.69 places TRU in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

XYL

37.52

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

A P/E Ratio of 37.52 places XYL in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TRU vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TRU

3.93

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

TRU’s P/S Ratio of 3.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

XYL

4.03

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

XYL’s P/S Ratio of 4.03 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TRU vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TRU

3.80

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

TRU’s P/B Ratio of 3.80 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XYL

2.84

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

XYL’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TRU vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTRUXYL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)43.6937.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.934.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.802.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.4040.41