Seek Returns logo

TRI vs. XYL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TRI and XYL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTRIXYL
Company NameThomson Reuters CorporationXylem Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesMachinery
Market Capitalization79.82 billion USD34.73 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 12, 2002October 13, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TRI and XYL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TRI vs. XYL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTRIXYL
5-Day Price Return3.39%0.59%
13-Week Price Return-8.27%13.89%
26-Week Price Return0.21%9.53%
52-Week Price Return9.38%5.35%
Month-to-Date Return-11.23%-1.35%
Year-to-Date Return6.95%22.97%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.52M1.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.37M1.33M
3-Month Volatility29.71%25.25%
Beta0.511.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TRI

13.40%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

TRI’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

XYL

8.70%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

XYL’s Return on Equity of 8.70% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TRI vs. XYL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TRI

22.34%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.34% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

XYL

10.74%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

XYL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TRI vs. XYL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TRI

29.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.19% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

XYL

11.81%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

XYL’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.81% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TRI vs. XYL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTRIXYL
Return on Equity (TTM)13.40%8.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.92%5.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.34%10.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.19%11.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)95.36%37.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

0.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

TRI’s Current Ratio of 0.79 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

XYL

1.90

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

XYL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRI vs. XYL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

0.17

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

XYL

0.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, XYL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TRI vs. XYL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TRI

17.23

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

TRI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

XYL

55.35

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

XYL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.35 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TRI vs. XYL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTRIXYL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.791.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.641.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.170.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.2355.35

Growth

Revenue Growth

TRI vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TRI vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TRI

1.26%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XYL

1.05%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Yield of 1.05% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TRI vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TRI

60.86%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.86% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XYL

39.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.55% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TRI vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTRIXYL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.26%1.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)60.86%39.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TRI

48.19

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 48.19 places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

XYL

37.52

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

A P/E Ratio of 37.52 places XYL in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TRI vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TRI

10.77

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 10.77, TRI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

XYL

4.03

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

XYL’s P/S Ratio of 4.03 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TRI vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

7.05

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

TRI’s P/B Ratio of 7.05 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XYL

2.84

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

XYL’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TRI vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTRIXYL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)48.1937.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.774.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.052.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.7540.41