Seek Returns logo

TRI vs. UNP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TRI and UNP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTRIUNP
Company NameThomson Reuters CorporationUnion Pacific Corporation
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization80.47 billion USD133.84 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 12, 2002January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TRI and UNP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TRI vs. UNP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTRIUNP
5-Day Price Return3.39%1.88%
13-Week Price Return-8.27%-1.66%
26-Week Price Return0.21%-10.08%
52-Week Price Return9.38%-8.29%
Month-to-Date Return-11.23%1.67%
Year-to-Date Return6.95%-1.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.52M3.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.37M3.69M
3-Month Volatility29.71%19.10%
Beta0.511.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TRI

13.40%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

TRI’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UNP

42.18%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UNP’s Return on Equity of 42.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TRI vs. UNP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TRI

22.34%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.34% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UNP

28.43%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.43% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TRI vs. UNP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TRI

29.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.19% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UNP

40.33%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.33% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TRI vs. UNP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTRIUNP
Return on Equity (TTM)13.40%42.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.92%10.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.34%28.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.19%40.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)95.36%79.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

0.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

TRI’s Current Ratio of 0.79 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UNP

0.65

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UNP’s Current Ratio of 0.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TRI vs. UNP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

0.17

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UNP

2.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

UNP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TRI vs. UNP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TRI

17.23

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

TRI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UNP

8.23

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UNP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TRI vs. UNP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTRIUNP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.790.65
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.640.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.172.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.238.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

TRI vs. UNP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TRI vs. UNP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TRI

1.26%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UNP

2.40%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Yield of 2.40% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TRI vs. UNP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TRI

60.86%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.86% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UNP

46.49%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.49% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TRI vs. UNP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTRIUNP
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.26%2.40%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)60.86%46.49%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TRI

48.19

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 48.19 places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UNP

19.36

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UNP’s P/E Ratio of 19.36 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TRI vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TRI

10.77

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 10.77, TRI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UNP

5.51

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 5.51, UNP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TRI vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

7.05

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

TRI’s P/B Ratio of 7.05 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UNP

8.46

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.46, UNP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TRI vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTRIUNP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)48.1919.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.775.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.058.46
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.7521.45