Seek Returns logo

TRI vs. UHAL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TRI and UHAL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTRIUHAL
Company NameThomson Reuters CorporationU-Haul Holding Company
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization68.39 billion USD9.56 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 12, 2002November 4, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TRI and UHAL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TRI vs. UHAL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTRIUHAL
5-Day Price Return-0.67%-3.03%
13-Week Price Return-23.10%-9.59%
26-Week Price Return-15.93%-13.69%
52-Week Price Return-6.28%-27.77%
Month-to-Date Return-2.20%-2.42%
Year-to-Date Return-8.44%-19.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.57M0.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.45M0.15M
3-Month Volatility32.03%25.46%
Beta0.231.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TRI

13.40%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

TRI’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UHAL

4.14%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UHAL’s Return on Equity of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TRI vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TRI

22.34%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.34% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UHAL

5.31%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

UHAL’s Net Profit Margin of 5.31% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TRI vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TRI

29.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.19% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UHAL

11.29%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UHAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.29% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TRI vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTRIUHAL
Return on Equity (TTM)13.40%4.14%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.92%1.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.34%5.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.19%11.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)95.36%36.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

0.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

TRI’s Current Ratio of 0.79 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UHAL

0.71

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UHAL’s Current Ratio of 0.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TRI vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

0.17

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UHAL

0.95

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

UHAL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95 is typical for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TRI vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TRI

17.23

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

TRI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UHAL

3.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UHAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.02 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TRI vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTRIUHAL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.790.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.640.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.170.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.233.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

TRI vs. UHAL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TRI vs. UHAL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TRI

1.46%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Yield of 1.46% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UHAL

0.36%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UHAL’s Dividend Yield of 0.36% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TRI vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TRI

60.86%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.86% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UHAL

6.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UHAL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.68% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TRI vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTRIUHAL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.46%0.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)60.86%6.68%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TRI

41.76

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

A P/E Ratio of 41.76 places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UHAL

31.07

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

A P/E Ratio of 31.07 places UHAL in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TRI vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TRI

9.33

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 9.33, TRI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UHAL

1.65

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

UHAL’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 aligns with the market consensus for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TRI vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

7.01

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

TRI’s P/B Ratio of 7.01 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UHAL

1.41

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

UHAL’s P/B Ratio of 1.41 is within the conventional range for the Ground Transportation industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TRI vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTRIUHAL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)41.7631.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.331.65
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.011.41
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.1849.05