Seek Returns logo

TPR vs. WSM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TPR and WSM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTPRWSM
Company NameTapestry, Inc.Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsSpecialty Retail
Market Capitalization23.56 billion USD24.52 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 6, 2000July 7, 1983
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TPR and WSM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TPR vs. WSM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTPRWSM
5-Day Price Return-0.18%-2.47%
13-Week Price Return28.94%19.64%
26-Week Price Return53.66%18.20%
52-Week Price Return136.17%26.63%
Month-to-Date Return11.20%3.86%
Year-to-Date Return73.30%5.55%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.40M1.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.94M1.50M
3-Month Volatility44.31%34.67%
Beta1.761.58

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WSM

51.57%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, WSM’s Return on Equity of 51.57% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TPR vs. WSM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

WSM

14.02%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.02% places WSM in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TPR vs. WSM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

WSM

17.95%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.95% places WSM in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TPR vs. WSM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTPRWSM
Return on Equity (TTM)10.99%51.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.10%21.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.61%14.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.21%17.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)75.44%45.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WSM

1.51

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

WSM’s Current Ratio of 1.51 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TPR vs. WSM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

TPR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

WSM

0.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, WSM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TPR vs. WSM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WSM

779.15

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 779.15, WSM demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TPR vs. WSM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTPRWSM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.871.51
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.230.69
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.790.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.53779.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

TPR vs. WSM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TPR vs. WSM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TPR

1.27%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.27% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WSM

1.24%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WSM’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is consistent with its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TPR vs. WSM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is within the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WSM

26.76%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WSM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.76% is within the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TPR vs. WSM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTPRWSM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.27%1.24%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.71%26.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TPR

128.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

At 128.26, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

WSM

21.60

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

WSM’s P/E Ratio of 21.60 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TPR vs. WSM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TPR

3.35

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WSM

3.03

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

WSM’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TPR vs. WSM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WSM

9.01

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

WSM’s P/B Ratio of 9.01 is in the upper tier for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TPR vs. WSM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTPRWSM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)128.2621.60
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.353.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)21.269.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.9623.28