TPR vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 10, 2025

Here’s a clear look at TPR and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

TPR is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	TPR	VIPS
Company Name	Tapestry, Inc.	Vipshop Holdings Limited
Country	United States	China
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods	Broadline Retail
Market Capitalization	24.18 billion USD	10.08 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 6, 2000	March 23, 2012
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TPR and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TPR vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	TPR	VIPS
5-Day Price Return	1.08%	0.20%
13-Week Price Return	22.56%	35.70%
26-Week Price Return	79.46%	37.90%
52-Week Price Return	155.71%	18.28%
Month-to-Date Return	3.17%	4.12%
Year-to-Date Return	78.80%	51.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.63M	2.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.84M	2.75M
3-Month Volatility	43.43%	29.12%
Beta	1.70	0.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 42.05%
Q3: 24.41%
Median: 17.18%
Q1: 7.87%
Min: -8.23%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIPS

17.61%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 47.53%
Q3: 31.20%
Median: 16.63%
Q1: 10.81%
Min: -7.57%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 17.61% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TPR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 21.16%
Q3: 13.26%
Median: 6.06%
Q1: 3.93%
Min: -3.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

VIPS

6.53%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 24.63%
Q3: 12.77%
Median: 8.63%
Q1: 4.50%
Min: -1.62%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TPR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 29.47%
Q3: 20.87%
Median: 11.68%
Q1: 6.26%
Min: -0.12%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VIPS

7.65%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 27.48%
Q3: 17.60%
Median: 10.82%
Q1: 7.76%
Min: -6.73%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TPR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	TPR	VIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)	10.99%	17.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.10%	9.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.61%	6.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	4.21%	7.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	75.44%	23.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.94
Q3: 2.22
Median: 1.61
Q1: 1.48
Min: 0.74

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 3.54
Q3: 2.42
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.69

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TPR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.79
Q3: 1.32
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

TPR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VIPS

0.17

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 2.01
Q3: 1.31
Median: 0.72
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TPR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 57.00
Q3: 32.83
Median: 7.87
Q1: 3.52
Min: -32.49

TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 37.34
Q3: 21.16
Median: 8.60
Q1: 3.22
Min: -19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TPR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	TPR	VIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.87	1.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.23	1.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.79	0.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	3.53	150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

TPR vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TPR vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TPR

1.24%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 5.22%
Q3: 3.07%
Median: 2.34%
Q1: 1.11%
Min: 0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 4.06%
Q3: 2.07%
Median: 0.37%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TPR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 156.63%
Q3: 94.60%
Median: 52.65%
Q1: 35.04%
Min: 0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is within the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 114.82%
Q3: 62.39%
Median: 28.55%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TPR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	TPR	VIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.24%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	35.71%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TPR

131.71

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 48.15
Q3: 33.82
Median: 20.70
Q1: 14.57
Min: 7.12

At 131.71, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VIPS

10.37

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 62.76
Q3: 32.50
Median: 17.65
Q1: 12.08
Min: 6.87

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 10.37 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TPR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TPR

3.44

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 4.35
Q3: 3.06
Median: 1.66
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 3.44 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

0.68

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.19
Q3: 3.25
Median: 2.13
Q1: 1.01
Min: 0.21

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TPR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 9.74
Q3: 5.59
Median: 3.41
Q1: 2.01
Min: 0.56

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.40

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 8.81
Q3: 5.19
Median: 3.42
Q1: 1.75
Min: 0.73

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TPR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	TPR	VIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	131.71	10.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.44	0.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	21.26	1.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	22.55	--