Seek Returns logo

TOST vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TOST and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTOSTZM
Company NameToast, Inc.Zoom Communications Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization21.36 billion USD24.25 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 22, 2021April 18, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TOST and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TOST vs. ZM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTOSTZM
5-Day Price Return-1.32%-1.78%
13-Week Price Return-15.92%5.00%
26-Week Price Return10.46%9.47%
52-Week Price Return33.58%20.56%
Month-to-Date Return0.36%-1.78%
Year-to-Date Return0.52%-0.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.30M2.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.12M3.17M
3-Month Volatility35.03%34.75%
Beta1.980.82

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TOST

13.88%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

TOST’s Return on Equity of 13.88% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZM

13.40%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

ZM’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TOST vs. ZM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TOST

4.05%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, TOST’s Net Profit Margin of 4.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ZM

24.99%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.99% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TOST vs. ZM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TOST

3.67%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

TOST’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.67% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ZM

20.43%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

ZM’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.43% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TOST vs. ZM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTOSTZM
Return on Equity (TTM)13.88%13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.99%10.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.05%24.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.67%20.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.19%76.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TOST

2.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ZM

4.45

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.45 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TOST vs. ZM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TOST

0.00

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

ZM

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TOST vs. ZM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TOST

-3.26

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

ZM

7.63

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

ZM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TOST vs. ZM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTOSTZM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.594.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.444.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.267.63

Growth

Revenue Growth

TOST vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TOST vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TOST

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TOST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TOST vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TOST

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TOST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TOST vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTOSTZM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TOST

95.36

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 95.36, TOST’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ZM

20.72

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/E Ratio of 20.72 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TOST vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TOST

3.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

ZM

5.18

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

ZM’s P/S Ratio of 5.18 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TOST vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TOST

14.11

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

At 14.11, TOST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZM

2.50

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

ZM’s P/B Ratio of 2.50 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TOST vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTOSTZM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)95.3620.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.865.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.112.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)42.0513.34