Seek Returns logo

TOL vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TOL and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTOLTSLA
Company NameToll Brothers, Inc.Tesla, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesAutomobiles
Market Capitalization12.74 billion USD1,458.71 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 8, 1986June 29, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TOL and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TOL vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTOLTSLA
5-Day Price Return-5.30%0.62%
13-Week Price Return8.86%48.27%
26-Week Price Return34.31%64.13%
52-Week Price Return-12.19%82.16%
Month-to-Date Return-4.34%-1.36%
Year-to-Date Return4.92%8.63%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.10M97.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.64M97.73M
3-Month Volatility35.13%45.56%
Beta1.431.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TOL

17.46%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, TOL’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TOL vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TOL

12.64%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.64% places TOL in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TOL vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TOL

16.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.25% places TOL in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TOL vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTOLTSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)17.46%8.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.90%4.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.64%6.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.25%6.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.65%17.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TOL

3.72

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

TOL’s Current Ratio of 3.72 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TOL vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TOL

0.36

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

TOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TOL vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TOL

-8.67

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

TOL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -8.67. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TOL vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTOLTSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.722.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.341.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.360.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-8.6771.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

TOL vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TOL vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TOL

0.77%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

TOL’s Dividend Yield of 0.77% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TOL vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TOL

7.01%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

TOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 7.01% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TOL vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTOLTSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.77%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)7.01%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TOL

9.15

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

In the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, TOL’s P/E Ratio of 9.15 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TSLA

240.63

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

At 240.63, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TOL vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TOL

1.16

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

TOL’s P/S Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TSLA

15.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 15.73, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TOL vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TOL

1.41

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

TOL’s P/B Ratio of 1.41 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TOL vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTOLTSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.15240.63
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.1615.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.4113.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.28261.14