Seek Returns logo

TMUS vs. Z: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TMUS and Z, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTMUSZ
Company NameT-Mobile US, Inc.Zillow Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesReal Estate
GICS IndustryWireless Telecommunication ServicesReal Estate Management & Development
Market Capitalization283.55 billion USD20.99 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 19, 2007August 3, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TMUS and Z by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TMUS vs. Z: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTMUSZ
5-Day Price Return-1.27%3.48%
13-Week Price Return4.65%34.01%
26-Week Price Return-4.28%8.51%
52-Week Price Return28.90%59.71%
Month-to-Date Return5.68%9.92%
Year-to-Date Return14.14%18.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.68M3.11M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.41M2.36M
3-Month Volatility23.82%33.63%
Beta0.612.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TMUS

19.69%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.67%
Q3
18.94%
Median
13.35%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-8.07%

In the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, TMUS’s Return on Equity of 19.69% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

Z

-1.30%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
8.92%
Median
3.63%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-8.05%

Z has a negative Return on Equity of -1.30%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TMUS vs. Z: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TMUS

14.53%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
17.18%
Q3
13.67%
Median
9.33%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-5.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.53% places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

Z

-2.60%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
57.16%
Q3
24.60%
Median
9.48%
Q1
2.61%
Min
-26.61%

Z has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.60%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TMUS vs. Z: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TMUS

23.08%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.46%
Q1
16.06%
Min
9.07%

TMUS’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.08% is around the midpoint for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

Z

-5.61%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
92.29%
Q3
43.61%
Median
20.96%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-48.90%

Z has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TMUS vs. Z: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTMUSZ
Return on Equity (TTM)19.69%-1.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.78%-1.07%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.53%-2.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.08%-5.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)63.61%75.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TMUS

1.21

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
1.00
Median
0.71
Q1
0.60
Min
0.36

TMUS’s Current Ratio of 1.21 is in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

Z

3.34

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.22
Median
1.42
Q1
1.03
Min
0.04

Z’s Current Ratio of 3.34 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TMUS vs. Z: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TMUS

1.45

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.57
Q1
0.91
Min
0.44

TMUS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.45 is typical for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

Z

0.05

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.30
Median
0.84
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, Z’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TMUS vs. Z: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TMUS

5.31

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.16
Median
3.95
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.20

TMUS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

Z

-1.97

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
23.14
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.29
Min
-4.45

Z has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.97. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TMUS vs. Z: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTMUSZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.213.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.083.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.450.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.31-1.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

TMUS vs. Z: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TMUS vs. Z: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TMUS

1.29%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
5.13%
Median
3.22%
Q1
2.33%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Yield of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

Z

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.51%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

Z currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TMUS vs. Z: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TMUS

30.87%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
145.86%
Q3
109.87%
Median
78.85%
Q1
48.65%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.87% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

Z

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
242.45%
Q3
106.13%
Median
55.27%
Q1
14.97%
Min
0.00%

Z has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TMUS vs. Z: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTMUSZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.29%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.87%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TMUS

23.93

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
34.45
Q3
23.52
Median
16.68
Q1
13.97
Min
7.48

A P/E Ratio of 23.93 places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

Z

--

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
41.09
Q3
23.50
Median
17.29
Q1
11.14
Min
6.36

P/E Ratio data for Z is currently unavailable.

TMUS vs. Z: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TMUS

3.48

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.94
Median
1.37
Q1
1.22
Min
0.62

With a P/S Ratio of 3.48, TMUS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

Z

8.01

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.22
Q3
5.64
Median
2.53
Q1
0.98
Min
0.01

Z’s P/S Ratio of 8.01 is in the upper echelon for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TMUS vs. Z: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TMUS

4.43

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.93
Median
2.02
Q1
1.33
Min
0.40

TMUS’s P/B Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper tier for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

Z

3.54

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.18
Median
0.75
Q1
0.35
Min
0.06

At 3.54, Z’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TMUS vs. Z: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTMUSZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.93--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.488.01
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.433.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.6975.01