Seek Returns logo

TMUS vs. WFC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TMUS and WFC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTMUSWFC
Company NameT-Mobile US, Inc.Wells Fargo & Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesFinancials
GICS IndustryWireless Telecommunication ServicesBanks
Market Capitalization291.50 billion USD250.38 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateApril 19, 2007June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TMUS and WFC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TMUS vs. WFC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTMUSWFC
5-Day Price Return3.48%-1.57%
13-Week Price Return6.04%2.76%
26-Week Price Return-2.29%-0.88%
52-Week Price Return31.09%38.46%
Month-to-Date Return8.64%-3.06%
Year-to-Date Return17.34%11.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.78M13.57M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.42M17.24M
3-Month Volatility23.46%24.23%
Beta0.611.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TMUS

19.69%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.67%
Q3
18.94%
Median
13.35%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-8.07%

In the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, TMUS’s Return on Equity of 19.69% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WFC

11.36%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

WFC’s Return on Equity of 11.36% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TMUS vs. WFC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TMUS

14.53%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
17.18%
Q3
13.67%
Median
9.33%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-5.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.53% places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WFC

22.19%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, WFC’s Net Profit Margin of 22.19% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TMUS vs. WFC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TMUS

23.08%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.46%
Q1
16.06%
Min
9.07%

TMUS’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.08% is around the midpoint for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WFC

25.35%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

WFC’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.35% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TMUS vs. WFC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTMUSWFC
Return on Equity (TTM)19.69%11.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.78%1.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.53%22.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.08%25.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)63.61%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TMUS

1.21

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
1.00
Median
0.71
Q1
0.60
Min
0.36

TMUS’s Current Ratio of 1.21 is in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

WFC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TMUS vs. WFC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TMUS

1.45

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.57
Q1
0.91
Min
0.44

TMUS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.45 is typical for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WFC

2.01

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

TMUS vs. WFC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TMUS

5.31

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.16
Median
3.95
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.20

TMUS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WFC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

TMUS vs. WFC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTMUSWFC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.21--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.08--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.452.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.31--

Growth

Revenue Growth

TMUS vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TMUS vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TMUS

1.29%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
5.13%
Median
3.22%
Q1
2.33%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Yield of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

WFC

2.53%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TMUS vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TMUS

30.87%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
145.86%
Q3
109.87%
Median
78.85%
Q1
48.65%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.87% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

WFC

31.00%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.00% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TMUS vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTMUSWFC
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.29%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.87%31.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TMUS

23.93

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
34.45
Q3
23.52
Median
16.68
Q1
13.97
Min
7.48

A P/E Ratio of 23.93 places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

WFC

12.27

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

WFC’s P/E Ratio of 12.27 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TMUS vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TMUS

3.48

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.94
Median
1.37
Q1
1.22
Min
0.62

With a P/S Ratio of 3.48, TMUS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

WFC

1.91

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

TMUS vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TMUS

4.43

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.93
Median
2.02
Q1
1.33
Min
0.40

TMUS’s P/B Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper tier for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

WFC

1.42

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

WFC’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TMUS vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTMUSWFC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.9312.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.481.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.431.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.6916.66