Seek Returns logo

TM vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TM and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both TM and VIPS are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolTMVIPS
Company NameToyota Motor CorporationVipshop Holdings Limited
CountryJapanChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization259.61 billion USD10.06 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 23, 2012
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TM and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TM vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTMVIPS
5-Day Price Return4.37%3.87%
13-Week Price Return20.62%36.36%
26-Week Price Return10.13%32.90%
52-Week Price Return14.38%19.09%
Month-to-Date Return4.37%3.87%
Year-to-Date Return-5.47%51.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume24.70M2.78M
3-Month Avg. Volume27.59M2.83M
3-Month Volatility36.09%29.08%
Beta1.390.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TM

12.02%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

TM’s Return on Equity of 12.02% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIPS

17.61%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 17.61% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TM

8.82%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.82% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIPS

6.53%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TM

9.60%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.60% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VIPS

7.65%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTMVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)12.02%17.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.61%9.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.82%6.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.60%7.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.29%23.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TM

1.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TM

1.07

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

TM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.17

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TM

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TM is currently unavailable.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTMVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.271.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.111.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.070.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

TM vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TM vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TM

3.18%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Yield of 3.18% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TM

38.83%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.83% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTMVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.18%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.83%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TM

8.66

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

TM’s P/E Ratio of 8.66 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

10.29

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 10.29 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TM

0.76

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.76 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIPS

0.67

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.67 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TM

1.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

TM’s P/B Ratio of 1.09 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIPS

1.40

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TM vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTMVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.6610.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.760.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.091.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)50.83--