Seek Returns logo

TM vs. UNH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TM and UNH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

TM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, UNH is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolTMUNH
Company NameToyota Motor CorporationUnitedHealth Group Incorporated
CountryJapanUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryHealth Care
GICS IndustryAutomobilesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization253.86 billion USD326.22 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 17, 1984
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TM and UNH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TM vs. UNH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTMUNH
5-Day Price Return-5.54%4.35%
13-Week Price Return12.52%16.74%
26-Week Price Return-2.86%-31.23%
52-Week Price Return14.38%-39.19%
Month-to-Date Return-1.56%4.32%
Year-to-Date Return-10.84%-28.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume24.75M9.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume27.25M15.26M
3-Month Volatility35.26%44.73%
Beta1.400.43

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TM

12.02%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

TM’s Return on Equity of 12.02% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UNH

22.26%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UNH’s Return on Equity of 22.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TM

8.82%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.82% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UNH

5.04%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

UNH’s Net Profit Margin of 5.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TM

9.60%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.60% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UNH

7.26%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

UNH’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.26% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTMUNH
Return on Equity (TTM)12.02%22.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.61%7.01%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.82%5.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.60%7.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.29%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TM

1.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UNH

0.81

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

UNH’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TM

1.07

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

TM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UNH

0.79

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

UNH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TM

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TM is currently unavailable.

UNH

6.14

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

UNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTMUNH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.270.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.110.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.070.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--6.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

TM vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TM vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TM

3.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Yield of 3.22% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UNH

2.38%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UNH’s Dividend Yield of 2.38% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TM

38.83%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.83% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UNH

36.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.54% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTMUNH
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.22%2.38%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.83%36.54%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TM

8.56

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

TM’s P/E Ratio of 8.56 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UNH

15.37

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

UNH’s P/E Ratio of 15.37 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TM

0.75

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.75 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UNH

0.77

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

UNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TM

1.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

TM’s P/B Ratio of 1.09 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UNH

2.82

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

UNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.82 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTMUNH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.5615.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.750.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.092.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)50.2112.95