Seek Returns logo

THC vs. WAT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at THC and WAT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTHCWAT
Company NameTenet Healthcare CorporationWaters Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization16.08 billion USD17.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980November 17, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of THC and WAT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

THC vs. WAT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTHCWAT
5-Day Price Return2.57%1.44%
13-Week Price Return10.21%-17.78%
26-Week Price Return40.39%-21.39%
52-Week Price Return11.16%-12.47%
Month-to-Date Return12.82%2.03%
Year-to-Date Return44.14%-20.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.00M0.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.54M0.69M
3-Month Volatility36.54%38.81%
Beta1.531.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

THC

37.25%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

THC’s Return on Equity of 37.25% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

WAT

35.02%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

WAT’s Return on Equity of 35.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

THC vs. WAT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

THC

7.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.17% places THC in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WAT

21.71%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.71% places WAT in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

THC vs. WAT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

THC

17.77%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.77% places THC in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WAT

27.69%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.69% places WAT in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

THC vs. WAT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTHCWAT
Return on Equity (TTM)37.25%35.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.11%14.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.17%21.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.77%27.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.36%59.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

THC

1.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

THC’s Current Ratio of 1.71 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

WAT

1.75

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

WAT’s Current Ratio of 1.75 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

THC vs. WAT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

THC

3.51

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.51, THC operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Providers & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

WAT

0.67

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

WAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

THC vs. WAT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

THC

10.27

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

THC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.27 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

WAT

11.29

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

WAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.29 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

THC vs. WAT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTHCWAT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.711.75
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.541.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.510.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.2711.29

Growth

Revenue Growth

THC vs. WAT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

THC vs. WAT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

THC

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

THC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WAT

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

THC vs. WAT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

THC

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

THC has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WAT

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WAT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

THC vs. WAT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTHCWAT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

THC

10.79

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, THC’s P/E Ratio of 10.79 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

WAT

26.76

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

In the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, WAT’s P/E Ratio of 26.76 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

THC vs. WAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

THC

0.77

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

THC’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WAT

5.81

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

WAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

THC vs. WAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

THC

4.36

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

THC’s P/B Ratio of 4.36 is in the upper tier for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

WAT

9.62

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 9.62, WAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

THC vs. WAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTHCWAT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.7926.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.775.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.369.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.2428.57