Seek Returns logo

TEM vs. ZBH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TEM and ZBH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTEMZBH
Company NameTempus AI, Inc.Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization12.73 billion USD20.94 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 14, 2024July 25, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TEM and ZBH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TEM vs. ZBH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTEMZBH
5-Day Price Return2.36%3.52%
13-Week Price Return14.97%10.38%
26-Week Price Return-12.50%5.81%
52-Week Price Return27.20%-5.42%
Month-to-Date Return29.49%15.34%
Year-to-Date Return117.06%0.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume15.32M1.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume12.07M2.13M
3-Month Volatility79.77%26.41%
Beta3.140.68

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TEM

-107.12%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -107.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ZBH

6.62%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

ZBH’s Return on Equity of 6.62% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TEM vs. ZBH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TEM

-20.98%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ZBH

10.51%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

ZBH’s Net Profit Margin of 10.51% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEM vs. ZBH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TEM

-24.66%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -24.66%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ZBH

16.09%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

ZBH’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.09% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEM vs. ZBH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTEMZBH
Return on Equity (TTM)-107.12%6.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)-15.77%3.74%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-20.98%10.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-24.66%16.09%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.73%71.06%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TEM

1.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

TEM’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZBH

1.87

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

ZBH’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TEM vs. ZBH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TEM

2.58

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ZBH

0.60

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

ZBH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEM vs. ZBH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TEM

-14.08

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ZBH

5.76

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

ZBH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TEM vs. ZBH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTEMZBH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.541.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.340.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.580.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-14.085.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

TEM vs. ZBH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TEM vs. ZBH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZBH

1.02%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZBH’s Dividend Yield of 1.02% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TEM vs. ZBH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZBH

23.39%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZBH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.39% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEM vs. ZBH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTEMZBH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.02%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%23.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

ZBH

22.82

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ZBH’s P/E Ratio of 22.82 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TEM vs. ZBH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TEM

13.37

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

With a P/S Ratio of 13.37, TEM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ZBH

2.40

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

ZBH’s P/S Ratio of 2.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEM vs. ZBH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TEM

35.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 35.53, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZBH

1.44

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

ZBH’s P/B Ratio of 1.44 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TEM vs. ZBH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTEMZBH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--22.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)13.372.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)35.531.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--15.78