Seek Returns logo

TEM vs. UNH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TEM and UNH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTEMUNH
Company NameTempus AI, Inc.UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization13.99 billion USD278.42 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 14, 2024October 17, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TEM and UNH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TEM vs. UNH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTEMUNH
5-Day Price Return2.64%-0.35%
13-Week Price Return38.49%1.47%
26-Week Price Return-1.75%-38.61%
52-Week Price Return12.66%-46.82%
Month-to-Date Return42.29%23.18%
Year-to-Date Return138.51%-39.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume15.30M24.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume12.27M18.87M
3-Month Volatility80.35%45.45%
Beta3.060.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TEM

-107.12%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -107.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

UNH

22.26%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UNH’s Return on Equity of 22.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TEM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TEM

-20.98%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

UNH

5.04%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

UNH’s Net Profit Margin of 5.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TEM

-24.66%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -24.66%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

UNH

7.26%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

UNH’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.26% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTEMUNH
Return on Equity (TTM)-107.12%22.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)-15.77%7.01%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-20.98%5.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-24.66%7.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.73%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TEM

1.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

TEM’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UNH

0.81

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

UNH’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TEM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TEM

2.58

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UNH

0.79

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

UNH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TEM

-14.08

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UNH

6.14

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

UNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TEM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTEMUNH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.540.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.340.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.580.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-14.086.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

TEM vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TEM vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UNH

2.88%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.88%, UNH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TEM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UNH

36.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.54% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTEMUNH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%36.54%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

UNH

12.70

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

UNH’s P/E Ratio of 12.70 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TEM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TEM

13.37

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

With a P/S Ratio of 13.37, TEM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UNH

0.64

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

UNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.64 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TEM

35.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 35.53, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UNH

2.82

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

UNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.82 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEM vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTEMUNH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--12.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)13.370.64
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)35.532.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--10.70