Seek Returns logo

TEM vs. THC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TEM and THC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTEMTHC
Company NameTempus AI, Inc.Tenet Healthcare Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization17.94 billion USD17.71 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 14, 2024March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TEM and THC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TEM vs. THC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTEMTHC
5-Day Price Return15.62%-1.43%
13-Week Price Return76.77%16.97%
26-Week Price Return123.63%50.90%
52-Week Price Return104.25%31.14%
Month-to-Date Return27.93%-1.26%
Year-to-Date Return205.84%58.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.78M0.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.33M1.40M
3-Month Volatility66.28%36.15%
Beta3.251.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TEM

-107.12%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -107.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

THC

37.25%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

THC’s Return on Equity of 37.25% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TEM vs. THC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TEM

-20.98%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

THC

7.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.17% places THC in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TEM vs. THC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TEM

-24.66%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -24.66%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

THC

17.77%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.77% places THC in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TEM vs. THC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTEMTHC
Return on Equity (TTM)-107.12%37.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)-15.77%5.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-20.98%7.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-24.66%17.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.73%82.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TEM

1.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

TEM’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

THC

1.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

THC’s Current Ratio of 1.71 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TEM vs. THC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TEM

2.58

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

THC

3.51

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.51, THC operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Providers & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TEM vs. THC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TEM

-14.08

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

THC

10.27

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

THC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.27 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TEM vs. THC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTEMTHC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.541.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.341.54
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.583.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-14.0810.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

TEM vs. THC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TEM vs. THC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

THC

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

THC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TEM vs. THC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

THC

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

THC has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TEM vs. THC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTEMTHC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

THC

12.02

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, THC’s P/E Ratio of 12.02 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TEM vs. THC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TEM

18.84

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

With a P/S Ratio of 18.84, TEM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

THC

0.86

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

THC’s P/S Ratio of 0.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEM vs. THC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TEM

35.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

At 35.53, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

THC

4.36

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

THC’s P/B Ratio of 4.36 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEM vs. THC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTEMTHC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--12.02
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)18.840.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)35.534.36
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--8.06