Seek Returns logo

TEAM vs. XOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TEAM and XOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTEAMXOM
Company NameAtlassian CorporationExxon Mobil Corporation
CountryAustraliaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyEnergy
GICS IndustrySoftwareOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization43.72 billion USD499.74 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 9, 2015January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TEAM and XOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TEAM vs. XOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTEAMXOM
5-Day Price Return-2.52%-3.11%
13-Week Price Return-21.36%2.52%
26-Week Price Return-30.46%-5.00%
52-Week Price Return-0.94%-4.46%
Month-to-Date Return-10.17%-0.67%
Year-to-Date Return-34.38%4.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.34M19.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.43M16.73M
3-Month Volatility43.64%19.54%
Beta0.960.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TEAM

-20.69%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

TEAM has a negative Return on Equity of -20.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

XOM

11.73%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

XOM’s Return on Equity of 11.73% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TEAM vs. XOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TEAM

-4.92%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

TEAM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

XOM

9.42%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

XOM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.42% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEAM vs. XOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TEAM

-2.50%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

TEAM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.50%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

XOM

12.31%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

XOM’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.31% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEAM vs. XOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTEAMXOM
Return on Equity (TTM)-20.69%11.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)-4.59%6.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-4.92%9.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.50%12.31%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.84%29.97%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TEAM

1.22

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

TEAM’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XOM

1.25

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

XOM’s Current Ratio of 1.25 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TEAM vs. XOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TEAM

0.73

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

TEAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XOM

0.15

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, XOM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TEAM vs. XOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TEAM

-11.02

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

TEAM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -11.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

XOM

20.20

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

XOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TEAM vs. XOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTEAMXOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.221.25
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.170.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.730.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-11.0220.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

TEAM vs. XOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TEAM vs. XOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

XOM

3.58%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

XOM’s Dividend Yield of 3.58% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TEAM vs. XOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

XOM

55.57%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

XOM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 55.57% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEAM vs. XOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTEAMXOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%55.57%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TEAM

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for TEAM is currently unavailable.

XOM

15.50

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

XOM’s P/E Ratio of 15.50 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TEAM vs. XOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TEAM

7.52

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

TEAM’s P/S Ratio of 7.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

XOM

1.46

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

XOM’s P/S Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEAM vs. XOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TEAM

39.62

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

At 39.62, TEAM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

XOM

1.77

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

XOM’s P/B Ratio of 1.77 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEAM vs. XOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTEAMXOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--15.50
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.521.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)39.621.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.7216.51