Seek Returns logo

TAK vs. TEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TAK and TEM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

TAK trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TEM is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolTAKTEM
Company NameTakeda Pharmaceutical Company LimitedTempus AI, Inc.
CountryJapanUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization47.02 billion USD12.72 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 5, 2010June 14, 2024
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TAK and TEM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TAK vs. TEM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTAKTEM
5-Day Price Return-3.13%-4.54%
13-Week Price Return4.55%11.17%
26-Week Price Return3.95%7.55%
52-Week Price Return5.51%21.02%
Month-to-Date Return4.55%29.40%
Year-to-Date Return5.02%116.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.59M12.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.17M12.37M
3-Month Volatility16.09%79.76%
Beta0.363.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TAK

1.48%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

TAK’s Return on Equity of 1.48% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TEM

-107.12%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -107.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TAK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TAK

2.36%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s Net Profit Margin of 2.36% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TEM

-20.98%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TAK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TAK

7.48%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

TAK’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.48% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TEM

-24.66%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -24.66%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TAK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTAKTEM
Return on Equity (TTM)1.48%-107.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.72%-15.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.36%-20.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.48%-24.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.51%60.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TAK

1.01

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

TAK’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TEM

1.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

TEM’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TAK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TAK

0.65

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

TAK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEM

2.58

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TAK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TAK

2.05

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TEM

-14.08

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TAK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTAKTEM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.011.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.521.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.652.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.05-14.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

TAK vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TAK vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TAK

4.23%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.23%, TAK offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TAK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TAK

138.69%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

TAK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 138.69% is in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TAK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTAKTEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.23%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)138.69%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TAK

66.26

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

At 66.26, TAK’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

TAK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TAK

1.56

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

TAK’s P/S Ratio of 1.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEM

13.37

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

With a P/S Ratio of 13.37, TEM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TAK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TAK

1.01

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

TAK’s P/B Ratio of 1.01 is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TEM

35.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 35.53, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TAK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTAKTEM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)66.26--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.5613.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.0135.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.08--