Seek Returns logo

SYM vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SYM and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSYMVRSK
Company NameSymbotic Inc.Verisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryProfessional Services
Market Capitalization27.01 billion USD37.31 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 9, 2021October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SYM and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SYM vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSYMVRSK
5-Day Price Return-2.27%-1.45%
13-Week Price Return55.42%-15.04%
26-Week Price Return70.93%-9.73%
52-Week Price Return105.39%-1.06%
Month-to-Date Return-15.22%-4.18%
Year-to-Date Return92.91%-3.04%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.89M1.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.04M0.93M
3-Month Volatility90.87%21.28%
Beta2.060.88

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SYM

-7.69%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

SYM has a negative Return on Equity of -7.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SYM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SYM

-0.71%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

SYM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.71%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

SYM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SYM

-5.20%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

SYM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.20%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

SYM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSYMVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)-7.69%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.88%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.71%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5.20%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.30%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

1.08

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

SYM’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SYM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

0.00

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SYM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SYM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SYM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSYMVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.081.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.901.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.0010.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--43.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

SYM vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SYM vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

SYM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VRSK

0.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SYM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

SYM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SYM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSYMVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

P/E Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

VRSK

41.55

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 41.55 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SYM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SYM

11.92

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 11.92, SYM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VRSK

12.75

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 12.75, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SYM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

108.69

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

At 108.69, SYM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SYM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSYMVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--41.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.9212.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)108.69139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)54.7237.30