Seek Returns logo

SYM vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SYM and UPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSYMUPS
Company NameSymbotic Inc.United Parcel Service, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization27.01 billion USD74.37 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateMarch 9, 2021November 10, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SYM and UPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SYM vs. UPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSYMUPS
5-Day Price Return-2.27%-0.07%
13-Week Price Return55.42%-9.52%
26-Week Price Return70.93%-23.70%
52-Week Price Return105.39%-30.83%
Month-to-Date Return-15.22%1.83%
Year-to-Date Return92.91%-30.42%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.89M8.84M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.04M6.45M
3-Month Volatility90.87%31.30%
Beta2.061.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SYM

-7.69%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

SYM has a negative Return on Equity of -7.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

UPS

35.27%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.47%
Median
11.35%
Q1
7.21%
Min
2.53%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s Return on Equity of 35.27% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SYM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SYM

-0.71%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

SYM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.71%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

UPS

6.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
6.18%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.32%
Min
0.61%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.34% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SYM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SYM

-5.20%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

SYM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.20%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

UPS

9.30%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
8.87%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.03%
Min
0.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.30% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SYM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSYMUPS
Return on Equity (TTM)-7.69%35.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.88%8.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.71%6.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5.20%9.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.30%81.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

1.08

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

SYM’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UPS

1.32

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.47
Median
1.29
Q1
1.05
Min
0.62

UPS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SYM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

0.00

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SYM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UPS

1.57

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.06
Median
0.72
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

UPS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.57. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SYM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

UPS

9.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.56
Q1
5.97
Min
-0.60

UPS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SYM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSYMUPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.081.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.901.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--9.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

SYM vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SYM vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

SYM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UPS

7.29%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.43%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Yield of 7.29% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

SYM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

SYM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UPS

94.15%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
54.10%
Q1
0.19%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.15% is in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SYM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSYMUPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%7.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%94.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

P/E Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

UPS

12.92

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
34.55
Q3
23.34
Median
16.33
Q1
13.38
Min
6.36

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s P/E Ratio of 12.92 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SYM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SYM

11.92

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 11.92, SYM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UPS

0.82

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.16
Median
0.59
Q1
0.36
Min
0.18

UPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SYM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

108.69

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

At 108.69, SYM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UPS

5.43

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.81
Median
1.82
Q1
1.20
Min
0.74

At 5.43, UPS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SYM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSYMUPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--12.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.920.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)108.695.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)54.7213.77