Seek Returns logo

SYM vs. UNP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SYM and UNP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSYMUNP
Company NameSymbotic Inc.Union Pacific Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryGround Transportation
Market Capitalization27.01 billion USD132.44 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateMarch 9, 2021January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SYM and UNP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SYM vs. UNP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSYMUNP
5-Day Price Return-2.27%-0.20%
13-Week Price Return55.42%0.20%
26-Week Price Return70.93%-9.61%
52-Week Price Return105.39%-8.60%
Month-to-Date Return-15.22%0.61%
Year-to-Date Return92.91%-2.07%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.89M4.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.04M3.75M
3-Month Volatility90.87%19.11%
Beta2.061.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SYM

-7.69%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

SYM has a negative Return on Equity of -7.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

UNP

42.18%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UNP’s Return on Equity of 42.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SYM vs. UNP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SYM

-0.71%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

SYM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.71%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

UNP

28.43%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.43% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SYM vs. UNP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SYM

-5.20%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

SYM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.20%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

UNP

40.33%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.33% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SYM vs. UNP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSYMUNP
Return on Equity (TTM)-7.69%42.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.88%10.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.71%28.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5.20%40.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.30%79.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

1.08

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

SYM’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UNP

0.65

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UNP’s Current Ratio of 0.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SYM vs. UNP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

0.00

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SYM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UNP

2.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

UNP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SYM vs. UNP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

UNP

8.23

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UNP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SYM vs. UNP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSYMUNP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.080.65
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.900.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.002.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--8.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

SYM vs. UNP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SYM vs. UNP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

SYM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UNP

2.40%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Yield of 2.40% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SYM vs. UNP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

SYM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UNP

46.49%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.49% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SYM vs. UNP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSYMUNP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.40%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%46.49%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

P/E Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

UNP

19.36

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UNP’s P/E Ratio of 19.36 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SYM vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SYM

11.92

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 11.92, SYM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UNP

5.51

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 5.51, UNP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SYM vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

108.69

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

At 108.69, SYM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UNP

8.46

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.46, UNP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SYM vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSYMUNP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--19.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.925.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)108.698.46
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)54.7221.45