Seek Returns logo

SYK vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SYK and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSYKUBER
Company NameStryker CorporationUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareIndustrials
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization141.08 billion USD205.31 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SYK and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SYK vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSYKUBER
5-Day Price Return-1.20%0.19%
13-Week Price Return-8.21%5.01%
26-Week Price Return-0.92%32.07%
52-Week Price Return0.80%29.33%
Month-to-Date Return-1.49%4.50%
Year-to-Date Return1.14%62.42%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.81M21.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.25M19.01M
3-Month Volatility17.50%28.08%
Beta0.911.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SYK

14.08%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

SYK’s Return on Equity of 14.08% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SYK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SYK

12.25%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

SYK’s Net Profit Margin of 12.25% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SYK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SYK

15.18%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

SYK’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.18% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SYK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSYKUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)14.08%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.52%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.25%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.18%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.62%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SYK

1.78

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

SYK’s Current Ratio of 1.78 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SYK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SYK

0.70

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

SYK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SYK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SYK

14.59

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

SYK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SYK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSYKUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.781.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.880.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.700.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.59-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

SYK vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SYK vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SYK

0.93%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SYK’s Dividend Yield of 0.93% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SYK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SYK

42.87%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SYK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.87% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SYK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSYKUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.93%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)42.87%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SYK

46.25

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

SYK’s P/E Ratio of 46.25 is within the middle range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

15.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SYK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SYK

5.67

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

SYK’s P/S Ratio of 5.67 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.27

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.27, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SYK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SYK

7.13

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

SYK’s P/B Ratio of 7.13 is in the upper tier for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SYK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSYKUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)46.2515.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.674.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.138.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.5423.64