SW vs. XPEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at SW and XPEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SW is a standard domestic listing, while XPEV trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	SW	XPEV
Company Name	Smurfit Westrock Plc	XPeng Inc.
Country	Ireland	China
GICS Sector	Materials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Automobiles
Market Capitalization	17.75 billion USD	22.52 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 17, 2008	August 27, 2020
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SW and XPEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SW vs. XPEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	SW	XPEV
5-Day Price Return	-3.41%	-3.96%
13-Week Price Return	-19.68%	26.95%
26-Week Price Return	-25.42%	20.41%
52-Week Price Return	-32.75%	87.34%
Month-to-Date Return	-7.12%	6.47%
Year-to-Date Return	-36.33%	111.59%
10-Day Avg. Volume	5.67M	25.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.50M	9.70M
3-Month Volatility	38.68%	65.50%
Beta	1.04	1.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SW

5.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 33.32%
Q3: 19.47%
Median: 12.36%
Q1: 6.76%
Min: -12.20%

SW’s Return on Equity of 5.12% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

XPEV

-13.77%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 28.52%
Q3: 12.92%
Median: 5.04%
Q1: -1.15%
Min: -15.36%

XPEV has a negative Return on Equity of -13.77%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SW vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SW

2.06%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 11.45%
Q3: 8.67%
Median: 5.36%
Q1: 3.40%
Min: -2.25%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 2.06% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

XPEV

-10.15%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.74%
Q3: 5.64%
Median: 2.77%
Q1: -0.52%
Min: -6.61%

XPEV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.15%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SW vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SW

5.23%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 12.87%
Median: 9.18%
Q1: 6.39%
Min: -0.41%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.23% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

XPEV

-12.08%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 13.07%
Q3: 7.22%
Median: 4.62%
Q1: -0.45%
Min: -6.16%

XPEV has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SW vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	SW	XPEV
Return on Equity (TTM)	5.12%	-13.77%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.05%	-5.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.06%	-10.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	5.23%	-12.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	19.81%	16.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SW

1.48

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.11
Q3: 1.55
Median: 1.33
Q1: 1.14
Min: 0.87

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.48 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XPEV

1.14

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.13
Q3: 1.58
Median: 1.28
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.47

XPEV’s Current Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SW vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SW

0.77

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 3.86
Q3: 1.96
Median: 1.25
Q1: 0.67
Min: 0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XPEV

0.89

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.00
Q3: 1.15
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.05

XPEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SW vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.38
Q1: 2.83
Min: 1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

XPEV

-19.31

Automobiles Industry

Max: 77.87
Q3: 35.88
Median: 13.88
Q1: 3.52
Min: -19.31

XPEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -19.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SW vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	SW	XPEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.48	1.14
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.97	1.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.77	0.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.41	-19.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

SW vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SW vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SW

4.71%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.42%
Q3: 5.04%
Median: 3.96%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: 0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 4.71% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.18%
Q3: 4.88%
Median: 2.84%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

XPEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SW vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SW

63.96%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 222.75%
Q3: 132.16%
Median: 63.96%
Q1: 27.01%
Min: 0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.96% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 114.43%
Q3: 60.59%
Median: 39.48%
Q1: 20.22%
Min: 0.00%

XPEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SW vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	SW	XPEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	4.71%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	63.96%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SW

19.17

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 19.86
Q3: 18.86
Median: 16.72
Q1: 13.58
Min: 6.36

A P/E Ratio of 19.17 places SW in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

XPEV

Automobiles Industry

Max: 31.96
Q3: 22.07
Median: 11.17
Q1: 8.41
Min: 5.02

P/E Ratio data for XPEV is currently unavailable.

SW vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SW

0.39

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.02
Q3: 1.14
Median: 0.89
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.31

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.39 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

XPEV

3.17

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.29
Q3: 0.84
Median: 0.51
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 3.17, XPEV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SW vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SW

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.85
Median: 2.17
Q1: 1.46
Min: 0.76

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

XPEV

3.99

Automobiles Industry

Max: 3.99
Q3: 1.96
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.18

XPEV’s P/B Ratio of 3.99 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SW vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	SW	XPEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	19.17	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.39	3.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.21	3.99
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	16.95	15.52